Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bare Shelves Biden's regime loses in another Court.
1 posted on 12/05/2021 5:29:59 AM PST by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

This is good news, as it’s blatantly unconstitutional.
It’s just an arbitrary Emperor’s decree.


2 posted on 12/05/2021 5:37:50 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

..And yet they keep appealing. Notice Biden and his just us department are appealing to a friendlier DC circuit court, the ones that Obama and Dems packed during his tenure.


3 posted on 12/05/2021 5:43:32 AM PST by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Nuremberg justice! NOW!


4 posted on 12/05/2021 5:45:24 AM PST by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

“delaying the standard would likely cost many lives per day”

I’d be interested to see how they prove that. Population-wide mortality rates do not seem to have gone down since the inoculations were introduced. All I’ve read or heard to explain that have been speculative rationalizations. This is the sort of thing you hear from people who are only interested in winning an argument, not in seeking the truth of a matter.

A simple understanding would be that a 75% inoculation rate ought to reduce average mortality by 75%. We should have pretty much licked this thing by now.


5 posted on 12/05/2021 5:48:58 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

This was just a ruling on motions. Not on the merits.


8 posted on 12/05/2021 6:39:12 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

FWIW, I’d say there’s a decent chance, if Deep State has decided to cut its losses, that Deep State will use the courts to KO the vaxx mandate.

That way Deep State doesn’t lose face and keeps the illusion that court system still functions as it used to do.

I think the last thing that Deep State wants is this for this to go to SCOTUS.

Because if Deep State uses SCOTUS to rubber stamp the mandate, then the last fig leaf will fall. And it will become very clear that we are no longer a republic.


10 posted on 12/05/2021 6:43:03 AM PST by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Can we get a ruling on some of these dictator Governors?


12 posted on 12/05/2021 7:12:20 AM PST by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Anyone trained in asbestos abatement knows it is illegal to fit a person for a respirator that has a beard. How can they enforce any mask wearing policy?


13 posted on 12/05/2021 7:14:08 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Another court, another loss to the communist tyrant dictators in the democrap party!


18 posted on 12/05/2021 8:32:12 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

My guess: The 6th will rule this mandate is constitutionally INSANE. The Supreme Court will refuse to hear the appeal because even the liberal judges don’t want to embarrass themselves on such an obvious overreach.


19 posted on 12/05/2021 8:34:10 AM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

BTTT


22 posted on 12/05/2021 9:43:32 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
In its Nov. 23 filing, the Biden administration argued that the Fifth Circuit panel erroneously interpreted the OSHA mandate, saying that “the speculative compliance costs and similar harms asserted by regulated parties cannot overcome the extraordinary harms to the public interest detailed above.”

“Simply put, delaying the standard would likely cost many lives per day, in addition to large numbers of hospitalizations, other serious health effects, and tremendous expenses,” White House lawyers alleged in the filing. “That is a confluence of harms of the highest order.”


Ok, let's say this virus had a 5% or even 20% infection fatality rate. Outside of closing borders and immigration, what Constitutional power does FedGov have then to do any mask or shot mandates? Hint: still NONE.
29 posted on 12/07/2021 1:11:41 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson