Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers Vetoes 5 Bills Restricting Abortion
Epoch Times ^ | 12/03/2021 | Mimi Nguyen Ly

Posted on 12/03/2021 9:40:39 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers announced Friday he vetoed five bills that would restrict access to abortion in the state.

Evers, a Democrat, characterized abortion as “reproductive health care,” saying on Twitter, “I just vetoed five bills that would restrict access to reproductive health care in Wisconsin.”

The governor is making abortion a major issue for his 2022 reelection campaign, vowing to quash any pro-life bills put before him.

“I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again today: as long as I’m governor, I will veto any legislation that turns back the clock on reproductive rights in this state—and that’s a promise,” he said on Twitter Friday.

In a separate video Friday, Evers accused Republican lawmakers across the United States of “attempting to create laws restricting women’s right to choose and cutting access to women’s health care.”

All five Wisconsin pro-life bills were written by Republicans, who do not have enough votes in the legislature to override Evers’s vetoes. Most of the five bills had been similar to those vetoed by Evers two years ago.

In October, when the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Assembly gave final approval to the five bills, Republican lawmakers said they were trying to pass them in part because there may be a chance Evers would change his mind. Meanwhile, all Democrat lawmakers voted against the bills.

One of the bills, the Shield the Vulnerable Act, sought to ban a person from performing an abortion if the person knows the woman is seeking an abortion solely because of the unborn child’s sex, race, or diagnosis of a congenital disability, such as Down syndrome. Evers had vetoed the measure in 2019.

The bill would also allow a claim for damages for violating the measure to be brought by other parties, such as the father of the unborn child or family member.

In a letter (pdf) to the Wisconsin Senate, Evers said the measure would “substantially erode and interfere with the patient and provider relationship by encouraging health care professionals to evaluate and even question the bases of patients’ decisions.”

“I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to politicians interfering between patients and their health care providers … I trust women to make the best reproductive health care decisions for themselves and their families,” he told lawmakers.

Republican state Sen. Julian Bradley in a statement, “Killing an unborn baby because of their sex, race, or disability is not health care. This is a radical, pro-discrimination veto from Governor Evers. Wisconsinites deserve to know life is valued whether they are a man or woman, white or black, or have a disability.”

Republican state Sen. Patrick Testin, who sponsored the bill, said in a statement he was disappointed in Evers’s veto. “Deciding who deserves to be born based on their inherited characteristics is discrimination … Wisconsin must affirm that every life has equal meaning and purpose.”

Another bill that was vetoed, the Prenatal Diagnosis Information Act, would have required doctors to alert parents of the unborn child if the child tests positive for a congenital condition, and provide information about the condition.

A third measure, A Woman’s Right to Know Act, would require doctors to tell any woman seeking a medication-induced abortion that there is a timeframe in which the effects of the first pill can be counteracted if they change their mind and want to continue the pregnancy.

The assertion that a medicine-induced abortion can be reversed has been criticized by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association as not based in science and potentially threatening to the patient’s life.

Evers also vetoed a bill that would require doctors to provide care for a child that survives an attempted abortion. The bill, which he had vetoed in 2019, would make violators guilty of a felony punishable by up to six years in prison.

The same bill would have made the act of intentionally causing the death of a child born alive after an abortion attempt a felony punishable by life in prison.

A fifth bill would reduce funding for abortion providers by prohibiting the state from certifying them as a provider under Medicaid. There would be exceptions in cases of sexual assault or incest, or if the woman’s life is in danger.

The Wisconsin governor’s veto of the five bills comes two days after a case that could overturn Roe v. Wade was heard in the U.S. Supreme Court.

A Wisconsin law enacted in 1849 made abortion illegal, allowing prosecutors to charge doctors with felonies for performing abortions, but it has been unenforceable since the Roe v. Wade decision. That law would take effect again if Roe v. Wade is overturned.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: abortion; babykiller; tonyevers; veto; wisconsin

1 posted on 12/03/2021 9:40:39 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Should be considered ineligible for office.


2 posted on 12/03/2021 9:42:55 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (No nation that sanctions the wholesale slaughter of its unborn citizens is fit to endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Get fitted for that millstone Evers.


3 posted on 12/03/2021 10:45:52 PM PST by The MAGA-Deplorian (. Democrats are lawless because Republicans are ball-less!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

please let him make abortion his main issue

please

it will take him down like like pounding in a tent pole.


4 posted on 12/03/2021 11:41:44 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ds have nothing else to run on in the ‘22 midterms, and only if Roe is overturned in summer.

R candidates will deflect to the voters/people of the individual states, at which time D voters will finally learn Roe did not halt abortions in the whole of the USA, deflating their abortion argument.

R “troglydite” office-seekers should easily weather criticisms with: “I’ll abide by what you —a voter in this state—decide. Further deflation.

It’s another losing argument for Ds.


5 posted on 12/04/2021 1:44:27 AM PST by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is no reproduction if you abort a child. Hence, they are not reproductive rights. If you have intercourse and you get pregnant, you have chosen to reproduce. Your choice is made.


6 posted on 12/04/2021 3:28:01 AM PST by GMThrust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrats want children vaccinated to save their lives if they don’t kill them in the womb.


7 posted on 12/04/2021 5:04:21 AM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Wisconsin men must groom women to allow them to have and enjoy unprotected sex without romance, commitment or fear of long term financial responsibility. Abortion which is inexpensive, readily available and socially acceptable allows men to meet their goals.


8 posted on 12/04/2021 6:45:41 AM PST by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Absolutely-—

Career as an ART TEACHER isn’t a resume for being a Governor.


9 posted on 12/04/2021 8:56:17 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Evers & Wolf...
Evers and Wolf...

Sort of reminds me of:
Stalin & Mao...
Stalin and Mao...

Same stinking song, slightly different arrangement...


10 posted on 12/04/2021 10:43:42 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Evers said the measure would “substantially erode and interfere with the patient and provider relationship by encouraging health care professionals to evaluate and even question the bases of patients’ decisions.”

But punishing healthcare providers for not pushing the clot shot? That's okay.

11 posted on 12/04/2021 1:42:08 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitude. --Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson