Well, I will say that a request to preserve potentially relevant evidence is much different from actually obtaining that evidence, so I’m not sure that particular privacy objection will get very far.
Well, I will say that a request to preserve potentially relevant evidence is much different from actually obtaining that evidenceEvidence relevant to what exactly? Counselor.
The “threat” to the Freedoms of the First Amendment is “palpable.”
That’s enough for me. Don’t threaten me.
Emanating, as it does, out of a committee illegally formed, and illegally constituted, it seems to me the demand for preservation must be null and void on its face.