Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pregnant Workers Deserve Protection
Townhall.com ^ | December 1, 2021 | Steve Sherman

Posted on 12/01/2021 6:34:04 AM PST by Kaslin

Most of the time, Congress is incapable of working in a bipartisan fashion. While the infrastructure bill is a recent exception, the Build Back Better spending bill will clearly be a Democrats-only bill. If you look at the approval numbers for Congress, you can tell that the American people are discouraged about the future and whether our lawmakers can get anything done across party lines. There is at least one issue, though, where both Republicans and Democrats can work together to address a pressing problem facing employers and workers.

With recent news of record numbers of Americans dropping out of the workforce, it is a good time to promote legislation that will help employers retain their employees. One easy fix is to find ways to keep pregnant workers on the job as long as they desire. Today, many pregnant workers are forced off of their jobs earlier than they would like, creating financial hardship and leaving yet another hole for employers to fill.

With rising inflation numbers, families are having a more difficult time filling up their gas tanks and affording food and other basic necessities for their family. Longer hours are needed by many growing families. Legislation that protects pregnant workers, while also protecting businesses from frivolous lawsuits, makes sense.

The area of bipartisan agreement is the protection of pregnant workers’ rights embodied in legislation titled the “Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.” The House version of the bill, H.R. 1065, passed on May 14, 2021, with over 300 votes in favor including 99 Republicans. Supporters include nearly all of the House Republican leadership, including Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Steve Scalise (R-LA) and Elise Stefanik (R-NY). This bill should sail through the Senate; it already has four Republicans cosponsoring the bill and was voted out of the health committee with a 19-2 vote, but a Senate floor vote is uncertain.

This is a piece of legislation that has the support of business interests, religious organizations, and civil rights groups alike. These groups have come together from very differing perspectives to provide legal certainty for employers and employees. The employers like the fact that they have a roadmap on how to treat pregnant workers without violating the law. The employees like having the protections in law so they can maintain a healthy pregnancy and push back if an employer is violating any of their rights. There are not many pieces of legislation that have the support of both labor and business interests. This is one.

The coalition supporting the bill includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber wrote a letter to the House and Senate that argued, “Employers currently face great uncertainty about whether, and how, they are required to accommodate pregnant workers.” Employers like the idea that they will be provided a proper definition of the parameters on appropriate accommodations for pregnant workers.

There is also support from pro-family groups. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote a similar letter to Congress where they argue that the legislation “will make the workplace a safer environment for nursing mothers, pregnant women, and their unborn children.” When the bill came up in the House, Pro-Life Caucus co-chairs Reps. Chris Smith (R-NJ) and Michelle Fischbach (R-MN) voted for the measure.

The specifics of the new proposed law are important. Many states have similar laws on the book, but a national standard is direly needed to ensure all workers are protected and all employers have the guidance they need. The new law would require businesses to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers. This accommodation requirement is modeled after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), meaning employers will not be required to navigate a new and onerous framework.

With all the fighting going on in Washington, D.C. over resident Biden’s Build Back Better spending plan and a perceived lack of progress to fight inflation, it would be nice for the two warring political parties to pause and show that they can work together when necessary. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is one of the few bipartisan issues that has enough support from business and labor interests to get through Congress. It also will be a message to growing families that politicians are trying to protect pregnant workers and their families at a time when it is all-hands-on-deck just to make ends meet for so many struggling Americans.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bps

1 posted on 12/01/2021 6:34:04 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Forced off their jobs early -—by whom?

Each individual employer should have the right to set their own policies.

NOT something the government should have any part of.

Many pregnant women have worked as long as they wish when pregnant.


2 posted on 12/01/2021 6:36:11 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

‘reasonable’ by whose ‘standards’?????


3 posted on 12/01/2021 6:37:16 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In my opinion, legislation which targets specific groups and tries to give those specific groups some sort of sweet deal is always bad.

I have nothing against pregnant women.
But I do not support legislation that gives them a special deal. I oppose special deals, on principle.


4 posted on 12/01/2021 6:39:10 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Alec Baldwin has killed more people than the Jan 6 protesters. And he will serve less jail time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

For them, it’s too late for protection.


5 posted on 12/01/2021 6:39:25 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE ( ‘When tyranny becomes law, resistance becomes duty.’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pregnancy rights? What country was this simpering derp born in?

Gotta wonder who funds garbage periodicals like this - Town Hall, Roll Call etc. Literally *nobody* is buying these useless RAGS anymore. Where are they getting paid?

And Kaslin, do you have any life whatsoever besides posting endless TRASH from DC legacy media crypto-leftists posing as Americans?

Then again, you’re a huge Fox News, Brett Baire fan, so you may just be hopelessly dumb.


6 posted on 12/01/2021 7:04:59 AM PST by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“... it is a good time to promote legislation that will help employers retain their employees. One easy fix is to find ways to keep pregnant workers on the job as long as they desire... “

Are you MAD!?

THIS is what concerns you at a time of promoted and forced (or lose your job) vaxxines?

When, because of the vaxxines, women are having spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, and still births at record numbers?
Not to mention the possibility of becoming sterile.

Go back in your cave and crawl under the first rock you find and never come out again.


7 posted on 12/01/2021 7:19:37 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

“legislation that will help employers retain their employees.”

The government is here to help.


8 posted on 12/01/2021 7:45:49 AM PST by alternatives? (The only reason to have an army is to defend your borders,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here is the Dept. of Labor basic rule on pregnancy:

Pregnancy Discrimination & Work Situations
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) forbids discrimination based on pregnancy when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, such as leave and health insurance, and any other term or condition of employment.

I’m not sure what problem they’re are trying to solve.


9 posted on 12/01/2021 9:55:52 AM PST by suthener ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson