Posted on 11/23/2021 6:11:03 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
A mistrial was declared in the murder trial of 48-year-old illegal alien Billy Chemirmir, accused of murdering 24 elderly Americans across Collin County and Dallas County, Texas, as the jury remained “hopelessly deadlocked” 11-to-1.
As Breitbart News has reported for years, Chemirmir, an illegal alien from Kenya who later secured a green card, is accused of murdering 24 elderly Americans in Texas from April 2016 to 2018.
Dallas County, Texas, prosecutors started the first of two trials against Chemirmir, where they sought a life sentence, detailing evidence that included testimony from 91-year-old Mary Bartel who alleges Chemirmir attempted to murder and rob her as he allegedly did with all of his victims.
Prosecutors told the 12-person jury that Chemirmir would break into a victims’ residence, smother them with a pillow until they were dead, steal their belongings and then sell their belongings online.
Late last week, as the jury went into deliberations, messages came back to the court that one juror had effectively stalled the process. The juror did not ask to again see the evidence presented at trial nor did they suggest that they would change their mind in their conclusion.
The jury sent a note to the court stating they were “hopelessly deadlocked.” The judge presiding over the case declared a mistrial as a result of the 11-to-1 hung jury.
“She didn’t even go back to [look at the evidence]. She had her mind made up before she walked in,” a family member of one of the victims told local media.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I was on a jury that deliberated for 3 days for a four hour trial.
I suspect that the jury just wanted to go home.
total bs
SPJNK.
Let me guess. Race. Gender. Political party.
Ok. You obviously want me to bite.
How was I wrong in saying a criminal verdict requires a unanimous jury whether for conviction or a a acquittal?
Got it. But by whom ? This isn’t some big crime boss on trial. That’s why it looks more likely to be some ultra woke loon.
All it takes is 1 dedicated communist to screw things up.
Sounds like a control issue rather than thinking through the evidence and determining their response.
I was on a murder case jury many, many years ago.
Had one young man (mid 20’s) and an older (40’s/50’s) woman who took the same line, except their thing was we don’t agree with the “death penalty”.
We were asked up front before jury selection if any of us had a problem with the death penalty, everybody said no!
It took two weeks but (and I admit it) I finally BULLIED them into a guilty verdict.
When the MURDERER is stupid enough to leave one of his 5 victims alive with just a bloody graze across the skull, the murderer DESERVES THE DEATH PENALTY FOR STUPIDITY if nothing else!
Naw...that wasn’t bait.
That’s what I thought.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.