Posted on 11/23/2021 6:11:03 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
A mistrial was declared in the murder trial of 48-year-old illegal alien Billy Chemirmir, accused of murdering 24 elderly Americans across Collin County and Dallas County, Texas, as the jury remained “hopelessly deadlocked” 11-to-1.
As Breitbart News has reported for years, Chemirmir, an illegal alien from Kenya who later secured a green card, is accused of murdering 24 elderly Americans in Texas from April 2016 to 2018.
Dallas County, Texas, prosecutors started the first of two trials against Chemirmir, where they sought a life sentence, detailing evidence that included testimony from 91-year-old Mary Bartel who alleges Chemirmir attempted to murder and rob her as he allegedly did with all of his victims.
Prosecutors told the 12-person jury that Chemirmir would break into a victims’ residence, smother them with a pillow until they were dead, steal their belongings and then sell their belongings online.
Late last week, as the jury went into deliberations, messages came back to the court that one juror had effectively stalled the process. The juror did not ask to again see the evidence presented at trial nor did they suggest that they would change their mind in their conclusion.
The jury sent a note to the court stating they were “hopelessly deadlocked.” The judge presiding over the case declared a mistrial as a result of the 11-to-1 hung jury.
“She didn’t even go back to [look at the evidence]. She had her mind made up before she walked in,” a family member of one of the victims told local media.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Unbelievable
Good gosh
It sickens me to realize that I can, to a near certainty, correctly guess the race of the hold-out juror. It happens also in Baltimore not infrequently.
FWIW, in this case I suspect jury tampering, not race.
I was om a jury like that once. One juror, an older man, said “I don’t like cops” and refused to listen to the over whelming evidence of guilt.
11 to 1 is a mistrial??????
The justice system at this point entirely depends on the jury’s demographics. Evidence is not the ultimate deciding factor anymore.
Yeah. Stealth BLM sympathizer, lied their way on the jury.
Criminal convictions and acquittals require a unanimous jury decision.
Too bad he didn’t break into my home. After the dogs were finished with him, I’d simply bury the rest.
The court system will punish prosecutors for challenging black jurors but there’s a reason why. Doesn’t matter it is a serial killer and the families will have to suffer through another trial. The jury nullification is real.
At least this guy can be retried. There was a former police chief who killed someone trying to steal his truck and jury found him not guilty. Said he “felt threatened.”
It’ll only get worse as the CRT kids today wind up on juries tomorrow.
Umm....
I wonder if that juror lied during the jury selection interviews?
Like most of our institutions, it, too, has been corrupted by the malignant disease known as liberalism.
If the juror refused to look at the evidence, the judge should have been able to recuse her as an “interested juror”.
Next time run for President. If you can pay for a bribed holdout juror you can afford to do campaigning until you get donors.
If one of the standard questions of jurors is still “will you base your decision only upon the evidence presented?” and the person said yes, then this person must have lied and should be tried for perjury.
The back door method is…
… alternative jurors.
OJ trial went through a lot of jurors!
FWIW, I don’t think so.
I don’t mean jury nullification.
I mean jury tampering.
was the juror white or other?.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.