[DoodleDawg]

Lin Wood and Peirce did not post the bond with with their own money, so they are not entitled to it.

Wood has no say in the matter. Peirce was acting as legal representative of the foundation that provided the money. His signature is on the check. The money will be returned to him and he will have to return it to Fightback Foundation.

With all the money Wood made from representing Sandnann, why is he risking disbarred by arguing he is entitled to the money that did not come out of his own pocket?

Because Wood is six kinds of crazy. The election showed that if nothing else.

Lin Wood and Pierce are going to lose this case.

Wood yes. Rittenhouse yes. Pierce no. Wisconsin law says the bail money goes back to who signed the check. That's Pierce.

[sauropod]

Yeah, I want DoodleDawg as my defense lawyer. /eyeroll

A kinder, gentler humblegunner.

[TigersEye]

Lin Wood is the FightBack Foundation. He founded it. He's the lead lawyer.

L. Lin Wood Chairman of the Board and CEO FightBackFoundation

[Tired of Taxes]

Peirce was acting as legal representative of the foundation that provided the money. His signature is on the check. The money will be returned to him and he will have to return it to Fightback Foundation.

Will the Fightback Foundation then be required to refund the money to the people who sent money for Rittenhouse's bail?