To: nuconvert
...they would have had convince a jury that they didn’t.I think that proof of GUILT is still required; thus:
The prosecutor would have to convince a jury that they DID.
112 posted on
11/21/2021 3:57:55 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
Technically, yes. But I think a jury would be swayed in this case to put the reasonable doubt on Kyle’s side and find the owners guilty. I’m sure Kyle’s lawyer put the fear in them by suggesting that they could be charged.
116 posted on
11/21/2021 6:15:12 AM PST by
nuconvert
( Warning: Accused of being a radical militarist. Approach with caution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson