Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Build Back Better Risks Supercharging “Greenflation”
Townhall.com ^ | November 20, 2021 | Oliver McPerson-Smith

Posted on 11/20/2021 5:52:39 AM PST by Kaslin

After months of telling American consumers that the inflation before their eyes was transitory or just a high class problem, the Biden administration has finally conceded that prices are indeed on the rise. Unfortunately, the renewable energy provisions within the president’s ‘Build Back Better’ reconciliation bill risk pushing costs even higher. Without overhauling the regulations that restrict the domestic production of critical minerals, the president’s bill will heap even greater demand on already slim resources.

From the supermarket checkout to the newspaper headlines, it’s hard to miss that inflation is at a 31-year high. A significant driver of that rise has been energy prices. For example, in Houston, the October price of motor fuel was up by 60%, year-over-year. In the Bay Area, consumer electricity prices are up 16% from last year. Across the country, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ data suggests that urban energy prices haven’t been this high since 2008.

As the country approaches a cold and expensive holiday period, the surge in prices has left the president’s ‘Build Back Better’ blowout bill in an unflattering light. While the administration’s allies eagerly try to make Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell the sacrificial inflationary lamb, even progressives are sounding the alarm on the inflationary pressures that a spending spree bill would unleash.

But the inflation debate has so far failed to consider how federally-induced demand for renewable energy and electric vehicles might affect consumer prices. From the gallium needed to make solar cells to the lithium in car batteries, a clean energy system requires an array of resources and critical minerals. These inputs are not tangential or ancillary costs that are hidden far up the supply chain. Rather, increasingly global demand for critical minerals is shifting the cost of green technology in what is often termed “greenflation.”

The ongoing experience of the world’s largest electric (EV) vehicle market, the People’s Republic of China, provides a cautionary tale. Having taken an early lead in the development and manufacture of EVs, it was expected by many that economies of scale would eventually reduce local consumer costs. But rising demand for nickel, cobalt, and lithium has pushed commodity prices higher and higher, with battery costs following the same path.

Unfortunately, the Build Back Better bill is currently scripted to aggressively acquire a colossal number of products made from these minerals. Among other initiatives, $5 billion is allocated to the General Services Administration to buy electric vehicles for the fiscal year 2022 alone (section 80001), another $3 billion goes to the US Postal Service for its own electric fleet (section 80003), and a sweet $10 million are earmarked for the District of Columbia to electrify its fleet (section 80008).

Buoyed by the president’s vow to make the economy carbon net-neutral by 2050, there can be little doubt that the allocated funds will be spent expeditiously. But the effect of a sudden rise in demand for electric vehicles and parts would not be limited to the car market. Batteries, and their critical mineral inputs, allow solar and wind power to be saved for when the sun doesn’t shine, or the wind doesn’t blow. The resources needed to produce consumer and utility scale batteries won’t be exempt from the Build Back Better demand blowout.

Ensuring that supply for critical and rare minerals will be key to keeping clean energy costs down. But, much like the global oil industry, the deposits and refining facilities of these critical minerals are geographically concentrated in select countries and regions. Due to this disparity, according to the Congressional Research Service, the United States is 100% reliant upon the import of 14 out of 35 critical minerals.

The short supply of these inputs is not completely lost on the White House or Congress. In June, a White House report acknowledged the lack of domestic production and refining. More recently, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocates $320 million to mapping the location of critical minerals in the United States (section 40201), as well as $400 million towards research on mining, recycling, and reclaiming critical minerals (section 40210).

However, all this investment in knowledge and efficiency will be wasted without addressing the regulations that prevent the extraction of critical minerals. Lengthy permitting processes and reviews have long bedevilled even the most strident ambitions. Federal permitting for critical mineral mining projects, just like major renewable energy installations, are subject to lengthy litigation through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In 2020, the Trump administration sought to streamline the onerous regulations in NEPA. Like clockwork, the Biden administration vowed to undo the reforms. Without forging a practical way forward, NEPA could stonewall the domestic supply of critical minerals.

Over the past year, the surging cost of energy has punished household budgets across the country. By driving up demand for critical minerals without facilitating their domestic extraction and procurement, the Build Back Better bill risks supercharging greenflation. Before sleepwalking into a foreseeable problem, the president needs to pre-emptively clear the regulatory roadblocks and capricious litigation that will hurt consumer budgets and hinder the clean energy transition.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: buildbackbankrupt; buildbackbetter

1 posted on 11/20/2021 5:52:39 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Build back worse.


2 posted on 11/20/2021 5:55:51 AM PST by Huskrrrr (Alinsky, you magnificent Bastard, I read your book!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The only thing Build Back Better will accomplish is the devaluation of the dollar, which is the intended goal. If Clueless Joe wanted to destroy this country, he wouldn’t do a thing any differently.


3 posted on 11/20/2021 6:01:34 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr
Build back worse.

They want Capitalism to fail so they can replace it with their dictatorship under communism.

4 posted on 11/20/2021 6:12:00 AM PST by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My power bill KWH rate went up 16.66 %


5 posted on 11/20/2021 6:15:04 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s their plan to collapse the system..
This is war..


6 posted on 11/20/2021 6:40:11 AM PST by aces (and )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

The “Better” part is free stuff for their supporters. Damage to the economy is not a consideration.


7 posted on 11/20/2021 6:44:58 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

One thing that stands out to me:

So we’re going to install half a million EV chargers... somewhere.

I’m pretty certain they can’t be added on to existing gas stations - high voltage and gasoline are bad together. So, these will have to be free standing. Are we going to build thousands of new ‘filling stations’?

And these aren’t gas and go. Under current tech, you’re looking at something like and hour or two, at least. So, there will be parking lots of EVs hooked up to charge, and a bunch of folks with nothing to do milling around. Currently, we have highway rest stops about every 50 miles - these will need to be every 25 miles at least.

Disregarding the problems with rare minerals and materials, this will require a charging station on almost every corner. And not some puny 220 volt circuit - we’re talking lots of 440 volt lines coming from... where?


8 posted on 11/20/2021 6:54:33 AM PST by Not_Who_U_Think
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Biden thinks he is a dictator already...


9 posted on 11/20/2021 6:55:19 AM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I was speaking to a friend at a restaurant this morning at breakfast about this very thing. He seams to think I need to be less harsh about politics, after all it’s just Democrats vs Republicans like it has always been. I can not convince him of the critical change, this is not politics as usual, this is a small, well funded group of Communists and fellow travelers changing this very nation from a representative Republic to a Communist Dictatorship. It is picking up steam and within a decade from happening. We need to be in prayer for our Nation and somehow collectively buy a news network to get the truth out. It will also be the best time for Christians to witness for Christ as our Nation falls apart and people seek guidance to understand what is happening.


10 posted on 11/20/2021 7:42:48 AM PST by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Exposed: Klaus Schwab's School For Covid Dictators, Plan for 'Great Reset' (Videos)

https://rairfoundation.com/exposed-klaus-schwabs-school-for-covid-dictators-plan-for-great-reset-videos/

The German economist, journalist, and author Ernst Wolff has revealed some facts about Schwab’s “Young Global Leaders” school that are relevant for understanding world events during the pandemic in a video from the German Corona Committee podcast. While Wolff is mainly known as a critic of the globalist financial system, recently he has focused on bringing to light what he sees as the hidden agenda behind the anti-Covid measures being enacted around the world.

Some Young Global Leaders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Global_Leaders#Members_and_alumni

Yes and even Maria Bartiromo

In addition to being a member of the Board of Trustees of New York University, Bartiromo is on the Board of Directors of the New York City Ballet, the Girl Scout Council of Greater New York; as well as PENCIL, Public Education Needs Civic Involvement and Leadership, which is a non-profit group focusing on improving New York high schools. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Economic Club of New York, and the Board of Governors of the Columbus Citizens Foundation. https://www.wict.org/bio/maria-bartiromo/

11 posted on 11/20/2021 8:20:18 AM PST by Pollard (PureBlood -- youtube.com/watch?v=VXm0fkDituE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Democrats Build Back Better = Oxymoron


12 posted on 11/20/2021 8:58:04 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Build back better means destroy everything and build it back for better control


13 posted on 11/20/2021 1:24:19 PM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson