So, the Governor is rejecting the demand that he act unilaterally in a top-down command and control capacity.
Isn’t that the very ESSENCE of Constitutional, Limited Government; that the actual decisions that affect citizens are being made at the most local possible level??
Other than exposing a glaring propensity on the right to sourly rail against what would be insta-labeled “totalitarian” or “tyrannical” if a Democrat did the opposite...
Look, had a Democrat Governor said they would top-down IMPOSE Statewide mask and vaccination mandates all you people would come UNGLUED! You despise CA Democrat Governor Newsom for this very reason, among others.
So, here’s a Republican saying he’s NOT going to do those things, but will leave it to the local municipalities and how do you react?? You STILL come totally UNGLUED!
Ya hate leftist top-down control everyone politics, but you equally hate right-wing hands-off local control politics.
AND ya hate anarchy.
DA FUQ can anyone do to please you???
Your utter implacability is a thoroughgoing argument in FAVOR of dictatorship: you refuse to be pleased, and you’ll never STFU no matter what, so the State may as well drive everything right from the top down and be done with it.
SOMEHOW I think that’s probably NOT what you want, but you need to get your impulse control nailed down and recognize Constitutionally supported victory when you see it.
So human rights violations are ok as long as my city council approved it and not the feds?
We hate bottom up tyranny just as much and not preventing it results in exactly the same outcome.
Almost as sane as declaring shoplifting less than $950.00 dollars is not even a crime that will be prosecuted will reduce the rate of imprisonment of criminals.