Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS Snooping Could Imperil Consumer Data
Townhall.com ^ | November 16, 2021 | Edward Longe

Posted on 11/16/2021 6:31:22 AM PST by Kaslin

Arguably one of the most concerning provisions in the Democrats’budget reconciliation package is enabling the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to look into American's bank accounts if they have deposits greater than $10,000, excluding salaries, each year. Not only does this provision represent a flagrant violation of privacy and a constitutional right to unreasonable search and seizures, but the provision could also leave Americans vulnerable to cybercrime and the threat of identity theft.

Under the proposal, banks would have to disclose to the IRS accounts "accounts that have total annual inflows or withdrawals of at least $10,000." The Treasury Department hopes that these new provisions will enable it to collect an additional $160 billion each year and $7 trillion in uncollected taxes over the next decade to fund social spending measures contained within the Build Back Better Act.

Proponents of the bill’s provisions, including Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), have claimed the proposals would allow the IRS to "zero in on tax cheats when the wealthy do not honestly report their income." Critics of the bill, most notably Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), have claimed the bill's provisions amount to "new snooping powers" that will treat "normal American households like everybody is under audit."

However, not widely discussed are the cyber vulnerabilities the provisions would create and how it could lead to the loss of sensitive financial information. For example, alongside the total deposits, banks would also be required to provide the IRS bank account numbers and potentially other sensitive information such as Social Security Numbers (SSNs) and debit card numbers.

While the IRS already obtains some of this information from annual tax returns, mandating banks furnish it to the agency creates the opportunity for cybercriminals to obtain the information through advanced hacking tactics.

The transmission of this information occurs when cybercrime and data breaches are becoming increasingly common. In 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) reported a total of 2,211,396 instances of cybercrime, with losses amounting to $13.3 billion. Additionally, estimates suggest that in 2020, there were over 1,000 data breaches in the United States, with 155 million records exposed to hackers. To put that number in context, half of America's population had at least one record exposed in 2020 and over two breaches each day.

The records obtained by hackers range from social media passwords to SSNs and other sensitive financial information.

While most of these cyber-attacks and data breaches targeted private entities, cybercriminals have also routinely targeted the federal government. For example, in 2020, the U.S. federal government was the victim of a massive data breach, with the Department of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Treasury, and Homeland Security all being targeted by a Russian-linked group.

While the IRS was not a victim of the 2020 federal government hack, cybercriminals have targeted the agency in the past. In 2015, hackers were able to successfully breach the IRS'Get Transcriptsystem to obtain the personal information of 104,000 taxpayers, information that criminals could use to apply for credit cards and loans without the victim knowing.

Proponents of the bill’s provisions, including Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), have claimed the proposals would allow the IRS to "zero in on tax cheats when the wealthy do not honestly report their income." Critics of the bill, most notably Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), have claimed the bill's provisions amount to "new snooping powers" that will treat "normal American households like everybody is under audit."

However, not widely discussed are the cyber vulnerabilities the provisions would create and how it could lead to the loss of sensitive financial information. For example, alongside the total deposits, banks would also be required to provide the IRS bank account numbers and potentially other sensitive information such as Social Security Numbers (SSNs) and debit card numbers.

While the IRS already obtains some of this information from annual tax returns, mandating banks furnish it to the agency creates the opportunity for cybercriminals to obtain the information through advanced hacking tactics.

The transmission of this information occurs when cybercrime and data breaches are becoming increasingly common. In 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) reported a total of 2,211,396 instances of cybercrime, with losses amounting to $13.3 billion. Additionally, estimates suggest that in 2020, there were over 1,000 data breaches in the United States, with 155 million records exposed to hackers. To put that number in context, half of America's population had at least one record exposed in 2020 and over two breaches each day.

The records obtained by hackers range from social media passwords to SSNs and other sensitive financial information.

While most of these cyber-attacks and data breaches targeted private entities, cybercriminals have also routinely targeted the federal government. For example, in 2020, the U.S. federal government was the victim of a massive data breach, with the Department of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Treasury, and Homeland Security all being targeted by a Russian-linked group.

While the IRS was not a victim of the 2020 federal government hack, cybercriminals have targeted the agency in the past. In 2015, hackers were able to successfully breach the IRS'Get Transcriptsystem to obtain the personal information of 104,000 taxpayers, information that criminals could use to apply for credit cards and loans without the victim knowing.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bankaccounts; data; irs; money; policestate; privacy; spying; surveillance

1 posted on 11/16/2021 6:31:22 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m telling you, the public is unaware and does care, until it’s too late.


2 posted on 11/16/2021 6:39:01 AM PST by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Almost all of the rent I receive is cash. I am now going to have to find a way to launder it?

We all better buy some Tide, the new and improved version.


3 posted on 11/16/2021 6:40:15 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is not targeted at the “wealthy.” This is intended to harass people on the low end of the scale. 10,000 per year is the threshold. People move money into checking accounts, and out of them, for many reasons. Savings to checking. Buy things. Send money back to savings.

This is to criminalize ordinary people and keep them scared under fear of a visit from biden’s gestapo.

But don’t worry. It’s only the first step. Second step is to eliminate cash. Then it’s total government control over finances (except those of members of congress and their sugar daddies who pay them to pass certain legislation).

The left is crafty. It knows how to turn this country communist without the folks becoming aware of it.


4 posted on 11/16/2021 6:40:33 AM PST by I want the USA back (Kick the creepy, sleepy, drooling self-pooping methane blaster out of the Oval Office. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Basically, if you have retirement investment income (i.e. 401k) of say, half a million dollars. And you withdraw 4% annually to live off of, that's only $20,000. And if you do it once per year (as Paul Merriman suggests) instead of doing it monthly, then someone living on just $20,000 per year in retirement is getting their bank information data dumped to the IRS.

Somehow the Dims that imagine a right to privacy for killing babies don't see a right to privacy for how you spend your money.

5 posted on 11/16/2021 6:40:38 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The best part of this? Here we have the FedGov wanting to snoop into everyone's private accounts for what accounts to pittances, while at the same time these socialist control freaks blow billions with zero accountability.

It's a world turned upside-down.

6 posted on 11/16/2021 6:41:27 AM PST by Joe Brower ("Might we not live in a nobler dream than this?" -- John Ruskin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Plus that 401k/IRA money is taxable as income so the gov gets its share too.


7 posted on 11/16/2021 6:41:41 AM PST by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
total annual inflows or withdrawals of at least $10,000.
8 posted on 11/16/2021 6:43:28 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (The kernel of our firm's job is to go with lots. - tnlibertarian job offer letter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Agreed. Of course, I converted a yuugge chunk of ours to Roth IRA money with the low trump tax rates.


9 posted on 11/16/2021 6:45:26 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So, the Fourth Amendment prevents the government from interfering with prenatal infanticide, but not from meddling with persons, houses, papers, and effects.

Only a demonrat could promote such a twisted, tortured rendering of the Fourth Amendment.


10 posted on 11/16/2021 6:48:38 AM PST by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
[...] if they have deposits greater than $10,000, excluding salaries, each year.

Just how is the bank to know what money is "salary" and what money is not?

I have never informed my bank of the identity of any employers of mine - of even if I am employed.

If $11,000 comes in from Company ABC, and another $11,000 from Company XYZ, how is the bank to distinguish them? I might be employed by only one of those two companies - or by both of them - or by neither of them.

Regards,

11 posted on 11/16/2021 6:49:33 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Switch to the Gain Flings Pods; they leave no trace, except a nice smell for the IRS.


12 posted on 11/16/2021 6:59:28 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature

Which means any average Joe with direct deposit is being monitored.


13 posted on 11/16/2021 7:06:34 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The US government IS cyber-criminal. . . .


14 posted on 11/16/2021 7:17:22 AM PST by RatRipper (The Biden Adm is leading an attack against US citizens . . . pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yep. Salami tactics.

Note that the administration has submitted a candidate for Comptroller who is an outright communist (PhD dissertation on why Marxism is superior to capitalism).


15 posted on 11/16/2021 7:31:09 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

I see people getting VERY creative...renters could start providing gift cards to grocery stores, etc...


16 posted on 11/16/2021 7:34:38 AM PST by goodnesswins (....pervert Biden & O Cabal are destroying America, as planned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

10K per year. How many taxpayers conduct over 10K per year in checking? Many people making these laws up don’t have any clue about how much money is spent per year by individuals in this country and the massive tsunami of extra work that’s going to be piled on the IRS, I really care about the IRS 🙄, but this bit of legislation seems extremely inefficient.

Would seem pretty easy to inundate the system hence causing inoridinate delays in upcoming processing of CY21 returns.


17 posted on 11/16/2021 8:05:19 AM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bookmark


18 posted on 11/16/2021 8:59:46 AM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The IRS will protect our private information... just like they did with Donald Trump and just like the FBI does say with contacts and phone numbers and names sent to the NY Times and others from a illegal raid on someone who reports on a pedophile who showers with his daughter....


19 posted on 11/16/2021 1:54:30 PM PST by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson