Posted on 11/16/2021 5:41:30 AM PST by Kaslin
Do you believe that all of us have blind spots of some kind? That all of us are shaped, for better or worse, by our own upbringing and environment? That we sometimes see things through an imperfect lens? And can you point to many blind spots among those whose beliefs and ideologies you reject? If so, perhaps we can explore some of our own blind spots here, and in this case, by “we” I mean we who are white Americans.
The truth be told, all of us, of all color and background, are much more inclined to see the blind spots of others, pointing out their biased thinking, their convoluted logic, their limited knowledge, and their faulty arguments. But how often do we examine our own points of view through that same lens of critical thinking?
A few years ago, after months of race-related discussion on my radio show, I put forth a simple thesis: White Americans often do not see racism when it is there. Black Americans often do see racism when it is not there.
Some, of course, found this thesis offensive. Many others, however, heartily agreed.
I suggest we test it out here.
As white Americans, when we watch the video of the tragic death of George Floyd, do we see this as race related? For many of us, the answer is no, even if we see it as an act of unjustified police brutality, worthy of conviction under the law (as the court ultimately ruled).
As for black Americans watching this video, this was yet another example of white brutality against an unarmed black man.
In response, we say, “But look at the facts. Look at the statistics. Only a dozen or so unarmed black men are killed by the police every year. You need to stop listening to the race-baiters.”
In response, our black friends say, “How many times have you been racially profiled? And do you need to have ‘the talk’ with your boys when they become teenagers, urging them to respond to police officers with the utmost respect lest they be shot? Or do you think we are just imagining the corporate pain that we feel?”
To be clear, and to reiterate what I have written and said elsewhere, I oppose the dangerous, anti-white curriculum that is popping up in schools across our nation. And I will continue to call out the false “white supremacist” accusations that are being hurled against us white conservatives by the hour.
At the same time, I must ask if we really want our children to know the painful truth of American history, one that is often more sordid than we would like to admit.
I was reminded of this when reading the new book by Charles Love called Race Crazy: BLM, 1619, and the Progressive Racism Movement. Love is a conservative black American who has appeared on Fox News and who is an opponent of CRT in our children’s schools. So, he is the opposite of a radical, race-baiting progressive.
Yet, when discussing one of the essays in The 1619 Project, he affirms some of the horrible realities of our past treatment of black Americans as pointed out by journalist Trymaine Lee, realities which still affect many black Americans today. (I remind you again that one of the purposes of Love’s book is to expose the dangerous biases in The 1619 Project, but here, there are facts he needed to affirm.)
For example, Lee points out that, on average, whites have 7 times the wealth of blacks in America. Love then writes (agreeing with Lee), “For the first seventy-five years post-slavery, this was nearly entirely the faulty of the government, either by racist laws or by negligence – taking no action as whites robbed, killed, and terrorized blacks.”
To illustrate this reality, Lee shares the story of Elmore Boling, a wealthy black businessman in Alabama who was murdered in 1947 by white men angered by his success. White creditors then took his money, leaving his family and descendants bereft of his wealth. Yet 1947 is not that long ago, and the effects of Boling’s murder and financial rape are still felt today by his grandchildren today.
Love then writes this: “Armed white people stormed prosperous majority-black Wilmington, North Carolina, in 1898 to murder dozens of black people, force 2,000 others off their property, and overthrow the city government. In the Red Summer of 1919, at least 240 black people were murdered across the country. And in 1921, in one of the bloodiest racial attacks in United States history, Greenwood, a prosperous black neighborhood in Tulsa, Oklahoma, was burned and looted. It is estimated that as many as 300 black people were murdered, and 10,000 were rendered homeless. Thirty-five square blocks were destroyed. No one was ever convicted in any of acts of racist violence.
“These were obvious acts of terrorism, but the government also played an active role in suppressing economic opportunities for blacks. . . .”
I can assure you that I never learned any of this as a child in school (at least, to the best of my memory).
Does this mean that white children today should be made to feel guilty about the past? Absolutely not – unless, of course, they are racists themselves, in which case they should be ashamed.
Does this mean that white kids should be identified as the oppressor class? No, no, no.
Does this even mean that white Americans should be paying out reparations to black Americans? Love himself writes, “I want to clearly state that I believe reparations were the proper response to slavery; I just believe the clock has run out on the payment.” Thus, we need to address the remaining inequities in more practical ways today.
Then what is the point of me sharing all this? It is simply that our black friends want us to listen and learn. They want us to understand their perspective. They want us to address our own blind spots. They want us to know our history better than many of us do, not just praising past American exceptionalism but also grieving over past American racism.
As one black caller said to me on the air one day, “I don’t want you to do anything about the pain we have experienced. I just want you to listen.”
It is the least that we can do.
Spots. He sees spots. Lots of spots.
“And do you need to have ‘the talk’ with your boys when they become teenagers, …”
Yes, I did. The same speech that got a guy fired a few years ago.
L
I will not nor will I ever “grieve” over something my great, great, great grandparents may or may not have done. And the “we just want you to listen” went out the window years ago.
What they are really saying is “shut up, whitey and hand over whatever we ask for.”
I’m sick of it.
L
The “Black Community” is a political construct to create the appearance of unity where there actually is none. The concept of a black community is racist to the very core of the thought
I think he’d be better served looking at black “culture” rather than blaming whitey.
No, navel gazing like this screed are the problem. People are people, done.
EXCELLENT ARTICLE thank you for giving a new perspective.
I understand the language of looters. The racial victimology is a new version of the ancient con game, but the substance of the arguments has not changed.
I have had the “talk” with all my children about how to interact with a policeman and I am white as can be.
Stay in the car
Keep your hands visible
Make no sudden moves
Be polite, contrite and respectful at all times
And above all, if you resist arrest in any way, fully EXPECT to be shot dead!
And do you need to have ‘the talk’ with your boys when they become teenagers, urging them to respond to police officers with the utmost respect lest they be shot?
Let’s just ignore current black behavior and focus on past white behavior, says the author.
No, they're not really interested in us "grieving" over past American racism, they want retribution for the racism that none of us had anything to do with, and they want us to ignore the epidemic levels of black racism against whites that exists today. Not only to ignore it, but to actively support it, and to PAY for the privilege.
Agree. This is defeatist tripe from those who will lead us to destruction.
Pretty clear that this writer has already been manipulated by the racism hustlers.
The facts are that George Floyd died of a drug overdose while being restrained by the police, after resisting arrest. The race of all involved in that is irrelevant.
The massive media propaganda campaign has been effective, but if a writer is going to ask people to use critical thinking, and introspection, he needs to give a much better example of his own thinking.
“And do you need to have ‘the talk’ with your boys when they become teenagers, urging them to respond to police officers with the utmost respect lest they be shot?”
I am lily white. I was taught by my lily white dad to be respectful to police officers. To this day, it’s “yes sir”, or “yes officer”, even to a 25 year old. This is silly. There is a reason many whites are wary of blacks from the outset. Check crime statistics and get back to me. Behave and we all get along.
These acts were not done by everyday Americans, they were done by progressive democrats. Today, those same progressives have turned their divisive policies on white people. It’s always one group against another with these progressive dems. It’s how they derive their power. It’s a very dangerous game, but it has played well for them so far. What scares me now is that they have actually made it acceptable to discriminate against people for being strait white. I myself am having difficulty finding medical care because of my race, sexual identity and preference. It may shorten my life because I do not fit in one of their aggrieved peoples bucket. I pay my bills and taxes which pay for those who do not pay their bills. It’s modern day slavery.
It's not too difficult.
I have a sibling who is a LEO. When pulling over any AA, the first response is usually 'you just pulled me over 'cause I'm black'. The fact that they were driving 95 mph has nothing to do with it!
Listen to what? Criminals fighting the police and then complaining when they get an end result they don’t like?
I was raised in a church with an anti-Catholic bias. It took me well into adulthood to realize and accept that the Catholics of today were not the same people that committed atrocities centuries ago.
It confounds me how people attempt to hold descendants accountable for the actions of their forebears. The “you owe me because your great, great grandfather owned my great, great grandfather” argument is destructive. Everyone has ancestors who were abused by one group or the other. The only way to move on is to let go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.