Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon indicted by federal grand jury for contempt of Congress
NBC News ^ | November 12, 2021 | Pete Williams

Posted on 11/12/2021 1:02:43 PM PST by Coronal

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was indicted by a federal grand jury Friday, charged with contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions from the House Committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

The indictment is a first. No one has ever been prosecuted before for contempt of Congress when executive privilege was asserted. The past cases involved defendants whose testimony was sought regarding their government service. Bannon, by contrast, left his White House job in 2017, well before the period of interest to the House committee.

If convicted, Bannon could face up to a year behind bars and a fine of up to $100,000.

The fact that the Justice Department was willing to charge him with criminal contempt, despite an assertion of executive privilege, may help persuade other reluctant witnesses to agree to cooperate with the committee's investigation.

The committee has subpoenaed 16 former Trump White House officials for testimony, documents or both.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: 1621; bannon; bannonindicted; bidenvoters; contempt; executiveprivilege; lawfare; squirrel; stevebannon; wengui
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: Wayne07

I am curious as to his reasoning for not appearing and claiming executive privilege.

The democrats own the DOJ. That much should be obvious now to anyone not living under a rock.


101 posted on 11/12/2021 3:35:28 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

If contempt of Congress is a crime, better prepare 250 million more indictments. I cannot think of anyone in my circle of acquaintances who doesn’t hold Congress in contempt and cannot wait for a massive turnover in 2022.


102 posted on 11/12/2021 3:35:45 PM PST by CommerceComet ("You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case, the government forgets the first." Rush Limbaugh )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Here is the letter Bannon’s lawyer sent. He is claiming executive privilege. It will probably be a long legal process, but I don’t think Bannon has solid claim. Trump clearly does.


103 posted on 11/12/2021 3:42:25 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

104 posted on 11/12/2021 3:43:05 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

I think Bannon is more effective outside the Trump inner circle.


105 posted on 11/12/2021 4:04:20 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Bammon, like Trump, actually has considerable filter. They just use it judiciously :-)


106 posted on 11/12/2021 6:11:53 PM PST by Bethaneidh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07
2 U.S. Code ยง 192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papers

U.S. Code

Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House, or any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or any committee of either House of Congress, willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $100 and imprisonment in a common jail for not less than one month nor more than twelve

Looks unonstitutional. Where in the Constitution does Congress get the legal authority to subpoena The People?

107 posted on 11/12/2021 8:22:12 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

That’s what I thought, unconstitutional. But even if SCOTUS ruled it so, Brandon and the lunatic gang don’t care.


108 posted on 11/12/2021 9:57:58 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson