exhibit #67 from Rittenhouse Trial
That is a photo of you, Yes?
Posted on 11/11/2021 3:48:21 AM PST by marktwain
U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- On day six of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin, November 8, 2021, the court video captured a particularly dramatic moment.
Gaige Grosskreutz has given testimony as a prosecution witness. He is being cross-examined by Corey Chirafisi, a defense attorney. It occurs about 2 hours and 27 minutes into this trial video on November 8, 2021. Over the next few minutes, there is this exchange:
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
So, your hands are up, and at that point he (Rittenhouse) has not fired. Correct?
Gaige Grosskreutz:
No he has not.
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
Do you agree at this point, you are dropping your hands, you are loading up your left foot, and you are moving toward Mr. Rittenhouse, at that point, True?
Gaige Grosskreutz:
Yes.
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
So, When you were shot; Can you bring up the photo? Do you agree, and now wait, how close were you, in the… How close were you, from the background.
Gaige Grosskreutz:
Three feet. If I was five feet before, so
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
At this point, you are holding a loaded chambered Glock 27 in your right hand, Yes?
Gaige Grosskreutz:
That is correct, yes.
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
You are advancing on Mr. Rittenhouse, who is seated on his butt, right?
Gaige Grosskreutz:
That is correct.
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
You are moving forward and your right hand drops down so your gun, your hands are no longer up, your hand has dropped down and now your gun is pointed in the direction, at Mr. Rittenhouse, agreed? I will give you another (exhibit?), and maybe that will help.
Defense attorney Corey Chirafisi:
So Mr. Grosskruetz, I am going to show you what has has been marked as exhibit #67.
exhibit #67 from Rittenhouse Trial
That is a photo of you, Yes?
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
Did this Grosskreutz pos get charged with menacing or brandishing, like that white attorney couple?
The first perp threatened Kyle with death threats, the second beat him on his head and neck with a skateboard, the third pointed a pistol at his head.
End of story, BUT, there is this thing called "jury intimidation"...we'll get you and your kids unless...
I am very concerned for Kyle, not because of the law, but because of the lawless.
This case should never have been brought to court.
I predict a couple of the prosecution's attorneys will lose their job.
Agree...But Gaige should be prosecuted.
How that kid managed all that, I don’t think anybody will ever know.
But but but….Gaige was involved with a “mostly peaceful and righteous protest” doncha know. 🙄
The prosecutor has spent the majority of the time trying to establish the innocence of the men who were shot.
“”The first perp threatened Kyle with death threats, the second beat him on his head and neck with a skateboard, the third pointed a pistol at his head.””
What needs to remembered about the first individual who chased Kyle was about 3 seconds before Kyle shot there was another individual behind them both who fired a shot with a pistol. He’s on video in a group of others who were also chasing Kyle. This was done while Kyle was running away. Kyle knew somebody behind him fired a shot but didn’t know who.
Grosskreutz was illegally in possession of a firearm.
Even though he was a felon in possession of a firearm, no, I don't think he was ever charged with anything.
It looks like the prosecution’s case being vaporized as well.
He had a ccw permit but it was expired.
Of course, he was also a che loving, communist carrying a pistol during a real insurrection and riot and that's okay, apparently.
The Judge can dismiss the case, with prejudice, if he so chooses, but then would need to get protection for himself and his family for the rest of his life. That is the way it is done in Mexico.
He was amazing for an untrained 17 year old.
George Soros is going to need to buy a new DA for that county.
Is it illegal if the feds authorize it?
“He had a ccw permit but it was expired.”
The Constitution hasn’t expired, how can a piece of paper validating a Constitutional Right expire.
They may get him for something but I don’t think it will be murder. I watched yesterday and thought the prosecution was going to get it thrown out by the judge. He pushed it for sure.
“”He had a ccw permit but it was expired.””
I’ve also heard that it was pulled, not expired. Either way it makes no difference, he was carrying illegally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.