Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim from C-Town

The only thing against outright dismissing the case is that it may not be the best for Kyle Rittenhouse. He needs a pronouncement of innocence, yea?


51 posted on 11/10/2021 7:02:32 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: All

Jurors are seated . . . oath has been given . . . so what’s left is

LET’S GET READY TO RUMBLE!!!!


53 posted on 11/10/2021 7:04:40 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
If the judge dismisses the case with prejudice, it means that he cannot be tried again on the same charges. It's equivalent to a not guilty verdict. If this was a run of mill murder case, I get the impression that the judge would have dismissed it with prejudice, but because of the publicity and the high profile, probably not. I do not know if he Rittenhouse might not be technically guilty of a weapons charge, but it seems abundantly clear that Grosskreutz is guilty of assault and of weapons charges.
110 posted on 11/10/2021 8:00:59 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Diana Moon Glampers for Secretary of Education! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson