To: Jim from C-Town
The only thing against outright dismissing the case is that it may not be the best for Kyle Rittenhouse. He needs a pronouncement of innocence, yea?
51 posted on
11/10/2021 7:02:32 AM PST by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: All
Jurors are seated . . . oath has been given . . . so what’s left is
LET’S GET READY TO RUMBLE!!!!
53 posted on
11/10/2021 7:04:40 AM PST by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Pilgrim's Progress
If the judge dismisses the case with prejudice, it means that he cannot be tried again on the same charges. It's equivalent to a not guilty verdict. If this was a run of mill murder case, I get the impression that the judge would have dismissed it with prejudice, but because of the publicity and the high profile, probably not. I do not know if he Rittenhouse might not be technically guilty of a weapons charge, but it seems abundantly clear that Grosskreutz is guilty of assault and of weapons charges.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson