Posted on 11/09/2021 2:04:55 PM PST by Impala64ssa
Ana Kasparian, far-left co-host of progressive news program "The Young Turks," admitted she was "wrong" for assuming Kyle Rittenhouse chased Joseph Rosenbaum before fatally shooting him last year amid rioting and protesting in Kenosha, Wisconsin, following the police-involved shooting of Jacob Blake.
In reality — and according to videos TheBlaze examined just two days after the incident — it was quite clear that Rosenbaum was the aggressor and was, in fact, chasing Rittenhouse that night.
It isn't so clear why Kasparian assumed the opposite all this time — though even the prosecuting attorney in Rittenhouse's murder trial last week falsely implied the Rittenhouse-chased-Rosenbaum narrative. But hats off to Kasparian for admitting she was wrong.
What are the details? "Initially I was under the assumption that Rittenhouse was the person who was chasing after Joseph Rosenbaum — that's how it had started," Kasparian said on camera. "But I was wrong about that."
She also said she wanted "to correct the record: I was, in fact. wrong about that. Look, these details matter, because if you're gonna make an argument that you acted in self-defense, there needs to be some proof that there was an imminent threat."
Kasparian added: "Now, what really mattered to me was how all of this unfolded. What was the thing that sparked it? What started all of it? And to show you the evidence to reinforce that I was wrong about that, I wanna go to this video that shows how everything really started."
She interrupted her commentary with the video report breaking down the timeline that night, first showing a very angry Rosenbaum hollering "Shoot me!" at rifle-toting folks in Kenosha there to protect businesses from looting and arson.
The clip also notes that a third party fired a shot into the air before Rosenbaum catches up to Rittenhouse and lunges at him — which is when Rittenhouse fired at Rosenbaum.
'Those details matter' "So, those details matter, right?" Kasparian continued after showing the timeline clip. "Who was chasing who matters, the gunshots by some other unidentified person, that matters — especially if you're Rittenhouse, and you're running away, and then you hear shots, and then Rosenbaum lunges toward him."
Anything else? Rittenhouse was charged with homicide and attempted homicide for fatally shooting Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber and wounding Gaige Grosskreutz and is now on trial. Rittenhouse pleaded not guilty and claimed self-defense.
As for Grosskreutz, he testified Monday that he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse fired at him and "vaporized" his bicep. Grosskreutz was carrying a concealed Glock that night but also said his concealed carry permit was expired at the time, according to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.
Grosskreutz also told prosecutors earlier Monday he attended the Kenosha protests as a medic and wasn't trying to be an active participant, but the paper said Grosskreutz admitted upon further questioning that he spoke at a rally hosted by the Peoples Revolution — a Milwaukee-based group that has protested against police violence — and made statements such as, "Long live the revolution."
However, Grosskreutz also testified he put his hands in the air after Rittenhouse shot Huber and then saw Rittenhouse "re-rack" his rifle, the paper said, after which he figured Rittenhouse wouldn't "accept [his] surrender" and then moved toward Rittenhouse.
He also testified that he wasn't "intentionally" pointing his gun at Rittenhouse, the Journal Sentinel said.
kinda hard to deny the video, isn’t it... ya miserable frunt you
“You simply do not have to prove your innocence in a real US court room.”
Perhaps, back in the day.
Too late. She needs to be sued into oblivion, as does the show she works, for until everyone she was near who ran this lie is asking folks if they want that sandwich in a large combo. It’s the ONLY thing these scum understand.
The illusion of The Narrative must be promoted and maintained at all times. It has nothing to do with reality.
I thought the problem began when Kyle Rittenhouse was putting out a fire that the rioters had started. The rioters got upset and decided to kill him.
She’s still going to get sued by the kid when he’s found not guilty. Just cause you apologize doesn’t mean you aren’t liable.
There was no mistake here. The information was online for any one to see and evaluate. Andy ng has a very well put together video.
No this woman lied. Just like the main stream media continues to lie about the daily outcomes of the trial. To make things worse when Kyle is acquitted
Correct. And supporting it, Grosskreutz lied a lot in his testimony.
Better late than never.
But you really have an obligation to make sure you understand the basic facts when you’re in a public media position and are making comments on someone about to be prosecuted.
Better late than never.
But you really have an obligation to make sure you understand the basic facts when you’re in a public media position and are making comments on someone about to be prosecuted.
I’m actually impressed by this.
Good job, Ana!
Has she been fired for telling the truth yet?
I agree.
Since an AR-15 automatically “re-racks” after firing, I’m sure there was a live round found at the scene after Rittenhouse ‘re-racked’ again, right?
Yeah, I agree with the others...she is trying to get out in front of any potential incoming lawsuit.
“Wrong as usual!”
Now that the election was stolen for Trump, and people are paying attention to the details of this case, I think many in the media are hearing the footsteps of lawyers and their defamation lawsuits approaching.
Rittenhouse will be acquitted and will become very, very wealthy from the media outlets who smeared him as a White Supremacist, murderer, etc.
After yesterday’s testimony she knows that nothing can save this case from going down in flames, and nobody is going to believe that it was a miscarriage of justice besides a few insane people. So she’s just doing damage control.
Funny, but I think that guy is on the defense team.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.