[ducttape45]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the judge is saying basically that since no one has been harmed by the mandate, and exemptions are still being reviewed, that there's no need to void the mandate? What kind of logic is that???

[ducttape45]

Vaccine mandate ping list.

Thoughts? At first glance, this does not bode well. Wondered what you all thought.

[David Chase]

“ Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but the judge is saying basically that since no one has been harmed by the mandate, and exemptions are still being reviewed, that there’s no need to void the mandate? What kind of logic is that???”
————————————————————————————————-

Because no one has been fired yet or any other repercussions from the mandate.

I don’t have a case if a Walmart has a wet floor just because they have a wet floor.

But if I fall on the wet floor…….there are now damages.

[Sequoyah101]

Easy, his real name is Ernst Janning.

I have been resisting a conclusion I have made today. We live in a lawless dictatorship. Can’t sugar coat that. It is.

[little jeremiah]

Hopefully expedited to a better fed court today. Is next step SCOTUS or a circuit court?

[lepton]

So the judge ruled not to block the mandate, but blocked any punishment under the mandate until the case is concluded.

[Dutch Boy]

The vaccine mandates should be fought on the grounds that the vaccines are not working against the spread of covid and that they have shown to be spreading it.

[patriot torch]

I learned yesterday that the plaintiff in this case is a grocery store employer of over 500 employees, and has filed this challenge on behalf of his employees, believing they should have freedom of choice. He is a devout Christian and a member of Family Worship Center in Baton Rouge LA. Jimmy Swaggart Ministries

https://fwcbr.org/

[Cboldt]

She has to find that the mandate is valid against everybody that does not have a granted exemptoipn fpor religious objection (or health objection - but that is not at issue in this case).

The only issue is the religous exemption, and as far as she’s concerned, everybody suing will get one, so where’s the beef?

[Political Junkie Too]

“This uncertainty weighs decisively against the ripeness of Plaintiffs’ claims and the irreparability of their purported injuries,” the court continued. “Emergency injunctive relief is not appropriate under these circumstances... “[T]he [Marines] have also failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success that their claims are ripe,” the court observed.”

I predicted this seven days ago:

---

So the judge is left with the standing argument. Once someone with "standing" gets their lawsuit in order, then the goalpost moves to ripeness (nobody is harmed until the illegal votes are counted for impact), and finally that it's too late to file (that the time to file was before the votes were mailed in without an SSN so the voter had the chance to fix it).

---

It's SOP for liberal judges. Just change the issue from ballot challenges to vaccine challenges.

So the judge is left with the standing argument. Once someone with "standing" gets their lawsuit in order, then the goalpost moves to ripeness (nobody is harmed until the illegal votes are counted for impact plaintiffs are fired), and finally that it's too late to file (that the time to file was before the votes were mailed in without an SSN companies fired employees so the voter employer had the chance to fix the policy).

-PJ

[yoe]

CLOSE OUR SOUTHERN BORDER! Have so many forgotten the invasion on our sourthern border? POTUS brazenly allows the Southern Border to stay open....

(Illegal pot fuels ‘narco-slavery’ in Rogue Valley)

[Brian Griffin]

Fear, uncertainty and doubt weigh on these people every day.

They are being harmed mentally.

The stress weakens their immune systems and places them in danger from a Covid infection they might otherwise shrug off.

Those who do not wish to partake of the fruits of a murdered baby can not make long-term purchases such as new car or house.

Car salesmen and real estate agents are being harmed by the lack of judicial action.

[Boogieman]

It’s pretty standard legal logic. You can’t sue for redress unless you can demonstrate you’ve experienced actual harm.

If I say “I’m going to burn your house down”, you can’t sue me for the cost of a new house. You have to wait until I actually burn it down before a judge would let that suit proceed. So someone will need to get their religious exemption denied, and then suffer harm like being discharged from the military, before they can sue to get some recompense for that harm they suffered, and possibly get a judge to stop others like them from being harmed the same way.

[Brian Griffin]

Those servicepeople that can be cowed by the threat of the loss of VA benefits and will likely bolt on the battlefields of tomorrow.

[kiryandil]

You have no standing to axe that question.

[dljordan]

“What kind of logic is that???”

Federal paycheck logic.

[dljordan]

“What kind of logic is that???”

Federal paycheck logic.

[ducttape45]

Just found out today that 3 religious exemption packages came back denied. The appeal process is now starting for those three. That is three out of 50 so far.

So the judge ruled incorrectly. People, good people, decorated veterans, are being systematically denied their religious rights, and are therefore "being harmed."