Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ducttape45

“ Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but the judge is saying basically that since no one has been harmed by the mandate, and exemptions are still being reviewed, that there’s no need to void the mandate? What kind of logic is that???”
————————————————————————————————-

Because no one has been fired yet or any other repercussions from the mandate.

I don’t have a case if a Walmart has a wet floor just because they have a wet floor.

But if I fall on the wet floor…….there are now damages.


3 posted on 11/09/2021 10:44:18 AM PST by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: David Chase

It’s one retarded judge. That’s my thought.


5 posted on 11/09/2021 10:45:17 AM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: David Chase

It’s one retarded judge. That’s my thought.


6 posted on 11/09/2021 10:45:17 AM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: David Chase

It’s one retarded judge. That’s my thought.


7 posted on 11/09/2021 10:45:18 AM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: David Chase

This has been a ruling roller coaster mandate...it will eventually end up in the Supreme Court’s lap. Praying they rule on the side of freedom of choice!


10 posted on 11/09/2021 10:48:39 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson