Posted on 11/08/2021 3:47:09 PM PST by Hojczyk
Immunologist Hooman Noorchashm, the medical expert for multiple NCLA challenges, called the study "another teleological piece of propaganda" by the CDC because it excludes the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and likely includes recovered people in the vaccinated group.
Harvard Medical School epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff tweeted that the study has a "major statistical flaw" – falsely portraying hospitalized respiratory patients as "representative of the population" – which renders the odds ratio "wrong."
Former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson argued the study "is meaningless gibberish that would never have been published if the agency did not face huge political pressure to get people vaccinated." It's not even clear enough naturally immune people were hospitalized to reach statistical significance, he said, noting there's no unadjusted odds ratio.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
The only immunity coming from this vaccine fiasco is for Big Pharma.
ALL vaccines are an assault on our immune systems....ALL
Vaccine Ingredients and Vaccine Secrets
https://healthwyze.org/reports/60-vaccine-secrets
..., the study “is meaningless gibberish that would never have been published if the agency did not face huge political pressure to get people vaccinated.”
—
The CDC having shredded its reputation, now takes the fragments, sticks them in a blender, and hits the puree button.
Did the CDC change the definitions of protection and natural immunity ,LOL
More “statistical” lying by the CDC to advance their agenda which happens to be the DemocRATS’ agenda… surprise, surprise, surprise. They want to INSTITUTIONALIZE and mak permanent the controls they “temporarily” put on Americans.
Natural immunity can vary in strength since it is possible to inhale a far below typical amount of inactivated virus.
Needs repeating. You are spot on.
“The only immunity coming from this vaccine fiasco is for Big Pharma.”
The study basically showed that more recent vaccinations had stronger protection than less recent infections, but was headlined and spun to simply be vaccines had greater protection than a recovery from an actual infection without the complete information. The reverse would no doubt also be true - more recent infections had higher immunity than less recent vaccinations.
Shows it’s deliberate and not stupidity/fear.
It = decision to spread propaganda saying vaccine is better at conferring immunity than actually having the disease.
SCOTUS in Throckmorton: “Fraud vitiates everything.”
We have been told so many lies that when this administration tells the truth, rare though it may be, we suspect we are being told a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.