Posted on 11/02/2021 6:33:15 AM PDT by Red Badger
New study by a Mayo Clinic doctor reveals those who received the J&J injection face more than three times higher risk of blood clots in the brain
A new study lead by a Mayo Clinic doctor suggests that individuals who were injected with the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are 3.5 times more likely to get Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis, a potentially fatal blood clot in the brain. According to the study, individuals who were injected with the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 shot are 3.5 times more likely to get a Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST), a potentially fatal blood clot in the brain, when compared to the pre-pandemic general population.
WebMD explains that CVST “is a type of rare blood clot that forms in the venous sinuses in your brain” that “can block the blood in your brain from draining out toward your heart” causing “a type of stroke” that “stems from internal bleeding.” The resource explains that “CVST can be life-threatening” and warns readers, “You’ll need immediate medical attention.”
The study was lead by Dr. Aneel A. Ashrani, a medical doctor and researcher at the Mayo Clinic’s Department of Internal Medicine. The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health. It was published in The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a peer-reviewed medical journal. Despite the increased risk, researchers insist the “absolute CVST risk was still low.”
The Mayo Clinic researchers also found that women between the ages of 30 and 64 were at the highest risk of the potentially life threatening blood clots.
While the Johnson & Johnson injection only accounts for a reported 4% of the reported 400 million people who’ve been injected with COVID-19 vaccines, many individuals chose to get injected with their shot because it only required a single dose to be considered “fully vaccinated.” This is no longer true, as booster shots for both the Johnson & Johnson and Moderna vaccines have now been approved.
Of note, the researchers reference reports made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) when presenting its findings:
As of May 7, 2021, 8 727 851 Ad26.COV2.S vaccine doses had been administered in the US; 46 potential CVST events occurring within 92 days after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination were reported to VAERS. Eight events were excluded because they were potentially duplicate reports (4) or were not objectively diagnosed (4). Twenty-seven of 38 objectively diagnosed cases of CVST after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination (71.1%) occurred in female individuals. The median patient age was 45 years (range, 19-75 years). The median time from vaccination to CVST was 9 days (IQR, 6-13 days; range, 1-51 days); 31 of 38 cases of CVST (81.6%) occurred within 15 days after vaccination, and 36 (94.7%) occurred within 30 days.
CVST was one of the vaccine reactions listed in the letter written by Dr. Patricia Lee, M.D., an ICU doctor based in California, who wrote to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claiming she has observed more vaccine injuries from the controversial COVID-19 vaccines than she has in the last 20 years working as a doctor.
In the letter, she described observing “transverse myelitis, resulting in quadriplegia, pneumocystis pneumonia, multi-system organ failure, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, postpartum hemorrhagic shock and septic shock, and disseminated CMV and CMV viremia.”
“I can no longer silently accept the serious harm being caused by the Covid-19 vaccines,” Dr. Lee concluded. “It is my sincere hope that the reaction to this letter will not be to focus on me, but rather to focus on addressing the serious safety issues with these products that, without doubt, you have either missed or are choosing to ignore.”
3.5 eh?...
“Rare...rare...rare...ra”
It’s my understanding that there’s quite a bit of variability in adverse effects depending on the lot number. So some might be getting normal saline and others a more toxic dose.
Sounds like a quality issue. Their manufacturing process is inconsistent.
It’s all good though, because they are 0% less likely to catch or spread “COVID”, and 0% less likely to die of “COVID” (just ask Colin Powell).
Now let’s see them do the same study on Pfizer…the kiddie vacc
Bet it won’t happen
All of these “studies” have devolved to the level of augury. We might as well cut birds apart to measure their livers, for all that we are learning. How about asking the question, “Why?”
Do we have to take the vaccine, to know what’s in it? - to paraphrase Nancy.
***
The great mRNA experiment is over. It cannot keep you from infection, it cannot keep you from transmitting, it cannot keep you out of the hospital, it cannot keep you from dying, has an unacceptable number of deaths and injuries and does not last very long. Lastly, it suppresses your natural immune system and we have NO idea of long term effects other than a lifetime of boosters.
One should always be skeptical of results stated as a percentage. For example, suppose something happens once in a hundred thousand. Three and a half times increase is still negligible, ie, 3.5 times in a hundred thousand.
I agree with your cautionary point about the meaning of percentages. However, these 38 people voluntarily (we guess) took a chemical injection manufactured by a “for profit” company and produced almost overnight when the odds are 99% that IF they had gotten Covid routine and existing treatment would have meant recovery/survival.
So, those of us not wanting to take this government mandated jab are basically believing the 99% recovery percentage and NOT any percentage or ANYTHING put out by the marxists in government or the marxist media.
The FR Vaxnation is not going to like this.
...says Phizer.
But seriously, didn't anybody study Moderna or Phizer "vaccines"?
Does anyone know whether they are saying that the danger is only when the vaccine is administered, or for anytime thereafter?
Cen-Tejas wrote: “So, those of us not wanting to take this government mandated jab are basically believing the 99% recovery percentage and NOT any percentage or ANYTHING put out by the marxists in government or the marxist media.”
The recovery rate isn’t 99%. That is the survival rate. COVID can have long lasting effects even if one survives.
Second, I wasn’t aware that Donald Trump was a marxist. These vaccines were developed by Trump, not Karl Marx.
Trump eliminated some of the government red tape in order to allow development of a vaccine in a faster way than normal. He did not develop the vaccine as he is not any kind of scientist. In fact, I wish he would begin to make that point.
How soon after getting the “vaccine”” are people developing blood clots? Does the risk go down as time goes on?
It varies from person to person...........
Freee-dame wrote: “Trump eliminated some of the government red tape in order to allow development of a vaccine in a faster way than normal. He did not develop the vaccine as he is not any kind of scientist. In fact, I wish he would begin to make that point.”
Trump takes credit for the development. Do you think he would allow a defective vaccine to be fielded?
An absolute perfect and succinct answer for my vaxxed panicked relatives when they tell me we're not getting together for Thanksgiving again this year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.