Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA Adviser Explains Why He Abstained From Vote on Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine for Young Children
Epoch Times ^ | 11/01/2021 | Zachary Steiber

Posted on 11/01/2021 8:25:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The only Food and Drug Administration vaccine advisory panel member to abstain from a major vote this week that essentially authorized Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children as young as 5 said he did so because of limited safety and efficacy data.

All 17 others voted to advise the administration, or the FDA, to authorize the jab for children between the ages of 5 and 11. The agency already supported doing so and is expected to formalize the authorization soon. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would then decide which children should get the shot.

The vote was preceded by nearly eight hours of discussions and presentations, with multiple members expressing concern about the scant data on how the vaccine will affect the age group.

But Dr. Michael Kurilla, an expert on infectious diseases and pathology who directs a division inside the National Institutes of Health, was the only one who didn’t support the recommendation.

Kurilla told The Epoch Times in an email that he opposed the specific, binary wording of the question, which opens up the possibility that any child between 5 and 11 will be able to get the Pfizer vaccine. He was also concerned about the longest follow-up for the clinical trial involving the age group being only three months, data that shows children experience severe cases of COVID-19 much less often than adults, and how a large chunk of them have already had the disease, giving them some level of immunity.


(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; children; covidstooges; fda; obamacare; pfizer; vaccine; vaccinemandates

1 posted on 11/01/2021 8:25:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The EPA is now nothing more than a rubber-stamp for the Swamp. That much is clear now.


2 posted on 11/01/2021 8:29:04 PM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

RE: The EPA is now nothing more than a rubber-stamp for the Swamp.

What does the EPA have to do with the Covid vaccines?


3 posted on 11/01/2021 8:29:44 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Going to need a bigger check.


4 posted on 11/01/2021 8:33:36 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What does the EPA have to do with the Covid vaccines?

Typo. I meant FDA. LOL.
5 posted on 11/01/2021 8:57:43 PM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“They didn’t pay me enough.....yet.”


6 posted on 11/01/2021 9:00:02 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

its clear the fda has been weaponized


7 posted on 11/01/2021 9:07:17 PM PDT by joshua c (Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I watched the hearing in it’s entirety and this Doctor was consistent in his opposition.


8 posted on 11/01/2021 11:50:11 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

With the amount of nepotism, cronyism, and corporate incest that goes on at the fda and the cdc it is natural to be cynical about the motivation of any member there as it is usually correct.


9 posted on 11/02/2021 12:27:12 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

He opposed, but did not vote against, which speaks volumes


10 posted on 11/02/2021 2:55:38 AM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Your typo was correct, but off topic!


11 posted on 11/02/2021 3:22:35 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (You are not a horse, you are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This guy apparently hadn’t passed through the FDA/Pfizer revolving door.


12 posted on 11/02/2021 3:24:50 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (You are not a horse, you are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

You are correct.


13 posted on 11/02/2021 5:20:32 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

Yes he did. I felt same as you when he did not vote firmly against. Those pushing this were trying to put it on the level of a vote against would hurt medically challenged kids who ‘need’ this protection. They also indicated parents of these children were praying for this protection. I would like to know who these parents or parent groups are. Perhaps they were pressuring members for approval. The whole thing stinks to high heaven…


14 posted on 11/02/2021 5:25:14 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson