Does anyone (who isn't a moron) still believe this fraud and liar after he failed to produce any evidence of network packet captures during his Cyber Symposium?
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks”
The format for the Cyber Symposium invited skepticism. For one thing, the evidence could easily be exposed to tampering. Secondly, many people these days would rather deny facts than accept the truth, even if the facts are clean and clear.
One must also ask, why would Lindell be the sole posessor of the evidence?
We’ve done the Republic a terrible disservice in accepting digital voting machines as opposed to paper ballots with serial numbers subject to/available for inspection by any and every legitimate voter both before and after the counting.
To be fair. The deep state made major threats to some of the people who were to be involved in the expose. They did that right as the Cyber Symposium was beginning. Scared the crap out of some of those people.
I know that does not prove there was ever anything breath taking that was going to be shared. But there might have been.
I too am a skeptic, But I can hope for the best.
Lindell's been claiming the Supreme Court, in a 9 to 0 decision, will return Trump to office before January 1st. So I guess that's the next test. Unless, of course, Lindell changes the date yet again.