Joe Rogan: Dr. Pierre Kory Said 200 Members of Congress Were Treated With Ivermectin

Real Clear Politics ^ | October 26, 2021 | Tim Hains

[george76]

Joe Rogan and Michael Malice discussed last week why the corporate press continues to dismiss ways doctors can treat Covid-19 aside from vaccination.

Rogan said that Dr. Pierre Kory from the Front Line Critical Care Covid group treated him and hundreds of members of Congress with monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, z-pak, NAD, vitamins, and ivermectin.

...

200 Congress people have been treated with Ivermectin for Covid. .. Before there were vaccines, this was a common off-label treatment for Covid.

"I do not know the motivation for demonizing this particular medication .. But I would imagine some of it has to do with money because... this a generic drug now. The patent has run out... and it's worth like 30 cent per dose."

[iontheball]

My mom has TOTALLY been on the Invermectin/ Frontline bandwagon from almost day one so has been taking Invermectin “preventatively” and consistently.

Talked to her the other day - yeah, she got COVID pretty bad. Just now getting over a 2 week long fight with the virus.

Yeah, Invermectin works just great alright.

Even the manufacturer (Merck) says that Invermectin does not work for Covid. Since they stand to make BILLIONS selling it if it did, why would they do that?

_______________________________________
Not sure if that is a snarky remark about Ivermectin and your mom or what. Ivermectin is mostly meant to keep you out of the hospital because it attacks the virus early and lessens the effects of the infection. The vax is no better than Ivermectin since it isn’t going to keep you from catching the aerosalized bioweapon or from getting sick. With regard to Big Pharma, it’s pretty obvious that it all comes down to money. Now, Big Pharma has declared war against aspirin because it’s being used to treat/prevent blood clots. The patents for HCQ, Ivermectin, and aspiran have long run out so they are open generics now and cheaper than dirt. You ought to be taking the lead of your mother.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

So most of Congress let everyone else not in their families and close friends twist in the wind. Does the good samaritan law not apply to those who sent to represent us in Congress?

[bramps]

I do not know the motivation for demonizing this particular medication,” he added.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Proof of the damage that pot does to your brain.

[BobL]

“you’re forgetting that all the dem and commie critters got vaccinated back in December”

Perhaps, but the discrepancy predates the election - during campaign season, Republicans were getting the virus non-stop...but never Democrats. Something was going on, and Ivermectin was already known for months as a possible treatment.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Interesting.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Politician: “I did NOT have pharmaceutical relations with those drugs.”

[ProtectOurFreedom]

“Since they (Merck) stand to make BILLIONS selling it if it did...”

No, you are wrong there. Ivermectin is off-patent, so they wouldn’t make anything selling it. They are only interested in selling drugs which they sank billions of R&D dollars into and are patent-protected for some years. Would you want to sell a drug for $2 a dose or $1,000 a dose?

[Cobra64]

Do you seriously believe that Merck would endorse Ivermectin? That’s because Merck has developed an Ivermectin substitute they will be pushing soon at $20 a pop. It’s called molnupiravir. It’s all about MONEY. People are so naive, it’s amazing.

[Captain7seas]

“”I do not know the motivation for demonizing this particular medication ..”

---

Let’s start with the LEGAL stipulation that the FDA has to meet before it can grant an EUA for the “vaccine”.

1. “There can be no effective, approved and available alternative”.

Now you know.

[StAnDeliver]

"Amy Klobacher’s husband got HCQ when he was diagnosed, no doubt in my mind..when the virus first hit he was spitting up blood, two days later he was “Cured” of covid..but of course she will never admit it."

Yep. Prof. Bessler (they don't share the same last name) cut the line to get into the Univ of Minnesota Hydroxychloroquine trial.

They mailed the Plaquenil to his home. He never had to leave the house.

[redgolum]

It is about money, power, and culling the population.

[StAnDeliver]

"Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID." - Dr. Kory on Twitter

Fun fact: Guesstimating a ridiculously wide rangespan of +/-100 isn't any kind of "fact", given the tiny population of 635 total Representatives + Senators.

If any of it is true -- and I'm anti-experimental serum -- that implicitly deserves a valid number, because "100-200" is some classically laughable FRacebooker spitballing right there.

[StAnDeliver]

"Even the manufacturer (Merck) says that Invermectin does not work for Covid. Since they stand to make BILLIONS selling it if it did, why would they do that?"

Because Merck's Stromectol (Ivermectin) is $2 to make and $4 at wholesale. Despite its proven efficacy as an anthelmintic globally, that market is surprisingly crowded and it has never driven their bottom line.

June 2021, Merck received FDA's $1.2B public commitment for 1.7 million doses of COVID-disruptor molnupiravir, with a contractual prospectus for 10 million (more) doses in the future. That math is obviou$.

Or is it really "obviou$" on FRacebook. *sigh*. Jesus wept.

$1.2B / 1.7M doses = $1,416 per dose
x 10 million doses (note the 10 million in the agreement does not include the original issue)
= $14.16B dollars

Ivermectin total revenue to Merck over 40 years is no more than 2/5ths of that number. In fact, this article was just released 3 hours ago:

Merck’s COVID-19 pill could bring in up to $7 billion in sales next year

"Merck & Co. Inc. predicts it will make between $5 billion and $7 billion in sales of its potentially game-changing new oral COVID-19 drug (molnupiravir) in 2022, assuming it’s granted regulatory authorization this year."