I understand. And I appreciate that your speculation has a basis in reality that is personally known to you; that’s the kind of credibility we need a lot more of. AND I appreciate you framing it as “speculation”; THAT is a breath of honesty we ALSO need a WHOLE lot more of.
I’m too often guilty, but there’s a wide-ranging tendency to take personal understanding and frame it as generally understood fact; occasions where phrases like “as I understand it,” and “I’m of the opinion that” would find far better employment. I’m making a personal effort not to speak unequivocally when the matter isn’t certainly known.
When I first used GO, it was in the application for hydrogen fuel cells. Early on in the nanotube development. A coworker was playing with using them to coat “large” molecules with various things.
One thing that kept happening was that the tubes would break on occasion. Not a huge deal, except for me after a while the fuel cell would degrade and we would be in trouble. So when people were saying they found Graphine in the jab it made sense. My coworker wasn’t working with phrama, but energy, still it made sense to extrapolate that is where the tech led.