Posted on 10/22/2021 7:19:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
On Sunday, KGVO reported that a 19-year-old man “on a worldwide trip from Afghanistan” was arrested and charged with having “sexual intercourse without consent” with an 18-year-old woman at a Residence Inn by Marriott in downtown Missoula, Montana.
According to KGVO and recent statements from Montana Governor Greg Gianforte, the suspect, Zabihullah Muhmand, wasn’t simply a world traveler. He was “in Montana under Humanitarian Parole, which is separate from the Special Immigrant Visa program.” In other words, Muhmand, the accused rapist, was an unvetted Afghan evacuee placed in Montana by the Biden administration.
On Thursday, Montana Governor Greg Gianforte told KGVO he had “serious concerns” about the vetting process of the Afghan evacuees by the Biden administration:
While I welcome our fully-vetted Afghan allies to Montana, this situation and others across the country raise serious concerns about whether the Biden administration is meeting its obligations to fully vet Afghans prior to resettlement.
I’m calling on President Biden to immediately halt resettlements to Montana until federal agencies provide me with adequate assurance that Afghans coming to Montana are fully-vetted in accordance with federal law.
It makes one wonder just what “adequate assurance” could even exist that would safeguard American women from Afghan men, who culturally don’t believe women have the same rights as men. As Republican Representative Matt Rosendale stated, “These Afghans do not share our culture and our values, and as this horrific incident shows they represent a serious risk to our communities.”
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
The PC term is “undocumented rapist.”
“Unfortunately that would be Illegal.”
How quaint. You still think we have laws.
We don’t.
L
“ Is the the nice woke way of saying rape?”
Rape has been redefined to mean many things, all for the purpose of making it easy to charge men. White men that is.
They should be housed in DC until they have been fully vetted. Interpreters and their families can be resettled with 3 or more American military members who served with them vouching for them. That shouldn’t be hard. Those who worked for the State Dept should be settled in DC and Northern Virginia.
bttt
Who didn’t see that coming...
WARNING: Not Safe for Work
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9e3f93500bac5e40d4d4d5ef6035734b398548986c713fb972d1abcfc93f326c.png
/bingo
Most Americans (not folks here) would be shocked to find out that these are not the shiny eyed, thankful, innocents we were led to believe.
They generally break into two groups:
Families of 9 or more, husband, 2-3 wives, a child bride and 4 children, generally with a male child bearing a striking dis-similarity to any other members of the family.
Hyper-agressive young men traveling alone.
As far as the vetting process goes, three groups:
Those with travel documents, bringing a large family with no travel documents.
Those with no travel documents, usually giving a name like "Mohamed Mohamed". The type of fella who might be pre-disposed to rushing their way onto a C-17 Globemaster.
Those with travel documents who are on a terrorist watch list. In this case, they're sent overnight to a local jail (y'know, just so they know we mean business, buster!) and then sent to the re-settlement staging area because the optics of either admitting we don't know who we're letting in or returning the "shiny eyed innocents who provided us with critical help".
Well, that didn’t take long.
More young women will have to buy guns and learn to shoot.
There soon will be no police to protect them.
God helps those who help themselves.
Montana Gov should make a plea to Rice to stop it.
Biden doesn’t know what is going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.