Can’t reply with a substantive answer? Show me where in any of the PHE docs cited as sources the author’s thesis is supported. I know you won’t, because you can’t, and you’d rather believe unscientific garbage than read anything.
Can’t reply with a substantive answer? Show me where in any of the PHE docs cited as sources the author’s thesis is supported. I know you won’t, because you can’t, and you’d rather believe unscientific garbage than read anything. Your argument is childish. Read the article. Words mean things. Then add what you've read to the plethora of other voices saying the same thing.
You don't get to 'debunk' THIS article while ignoring the rest of the science as if it didn't exist.
But your 'read the study' strategy looks good on paper. If children were reading your paper. Trouble is, we're growed.
