Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Institutes of Health director to step down: Report
The Washington Times ^ | 10/4/21 | Victor Morton

Posted on 10/04/2021 8:03:24 PM PDT by tatown

The National Institutes of Health’s longest-serving director will reportedly step down Tuesday.

Politico reported Monday night, citing three unnamed sources that Dr. Francis Collins will announce his resignation after having led the agency for 12 years.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigjabpusher; buhbyetofaucisguy; collins; countingpfizerbucks; nih
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: tatown

We should have the Simon Wiesenthal Center catalog track all of the people in these organizations that pushed these vaccines on the population.


21 posted on 10/04/2021 8:59:28 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

The Kentucky study showed that vaccine immunity was superior to natural immunity. What most people don’t know is both compliment each other. If you are vaccinated, and catch the virus, you will stimulate your natural immunity that will compliment the immunity from the vaccine. Both will protect against any future infections.


22 posted on 10/04/2021 9:00:45 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

Will never announce that. Just take the money and run.


23 posted on 10/04/2021 9:04:52 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
The Kentucky study showed that vaccine immunity was superior to natural immunity. What most people don’t know is both compliment each other. If you are vaccinated, and catch the virus, you will stimulate your natural immunity that will compliment the immunity from the vaccine. Both will protect against any future infections.

You keep spouting nonsense.

24 posted on 10/04/2021 9:05:20 PM PDT by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
"Let him stand trial at Nuremberg II as a former government employee then."

MYTH: The COVID-19 vaccines violate the Nuremberg Code, which bans medical experiments from being performed on humans without their consent.

Vaccines that have gone through multiple rounds of testing in clinical trials and have then been approved for widespread use by regulators are not in violation of the Nuremberg Code’s principles. For example, the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer and BioNTech was authorized for emergency use by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020 only after it went through multiple clinical trials to demonstrate its safety and efficacy, with the final Phase 3 trial involving 43,000 patients.

“The Nuremberg Code is about doing human experiments, not vaccination,” Dr. Jonathan Moreno, professor of bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania,

25 posted on 10/04/2021 9:18:20 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tatown

“Dr. Francis Collins will announce his resignation.” He is brilliant and his books are very helpful. Humble guy with musical talent and math genius. Too bad he got mixed up with the losers in NIH who just use medicine like personal ATM machines. Yes, Collins is a strong Christian. Yes, he will need to do major penance to get an ounce of mercy for his role in the harmful vaccine push.


26 posted on 10/04/2021 9:37:52 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
MYTH: The COVID-19 vaccines violate the Nuremberg Code, which bans medical experiments from being performed on humans without their consent.

When the GOVERNMENT admits the Jim Jones Jab will not prevent you from getting COVID, nor will it prevent you from spreading it to others, THEY ADMIT that it's not a vaccine. What is it then other than an experiment? Forcing that experiment on victims without their consent is EXACTLY what the Nuremberg Code covers.

Forget Dr. Jonathan Moreno from the University of Pennsylvania. He can have someone from their English Department explain to him that something that doesn't protect the recipient nor protect others is not defined in any sense of the word as a vaccine.

27 posted on 10/04/2021 9:38:02 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bray

I think there’s going to be a lot more bailing as well if affiliated with any facility that treats people.


28 posted on 10/04/2021 9:42:00 PM PDT by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
You are gaslighting me and you know it.

mRNA vaccines, such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are vaccines. They use a new technology that works differently than other types of vaccines. Research and development of that technology has been under way for decades. The mRNA vaccines do not contain any live virus. Instead, they work by teaching our cells to make a harmless piece of a “spike protein,” which is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19. After making the protein piece, cells display it on their surface. Our immune system then recognizes that it does not belong there and responds to get rid of it. When an immune response begins, antibodies are produced, creating the same response that happens in a natural infection. Many other vaccines use a piece of, or weakened version of, the germ that the vaccine protects against. This is how the measles and flu vaccines work. When a weakened or small part of the virus is introduced to your body, you make antibodies to help protect against future infection.

The CDC, which is a public-private entity, says on their web site, "COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of getting COVID-19 and helps protect you from severe illness. Before the more contagious Delta Variant (and the Alpha Variant), the vaccine prevented the transmission by as much as 80%. It was enough to relax the need to wear masks. Studies suggest that the Delta Variant has changes in its spike protein making it more efficient at both grabbing onto receptors and getting into your cells. Scientists are still learning about the Delta Virus. They are learning that the natural immunity works in conjunction with the vaccine. They call it hybrid immunity. As Covid Delta attacks you, the vaccine will cause you to have a milder infection as your natural immunity get primed for the virus. The nest time you are infected, it will be milder than the last, until future infections might be just a runny nose.

29 posted on 10/04/2021 11:14:26 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DSH

Why call it “spouting nonsense.” That is an Argument from Incredulity: The popular fallacy of doubting or rejecting a novel claim or argument out of hand simply because it appears superficially “incredible,” “insane” or “crazy,” or because it goes against one’s own personal beliefs, prior experience or ideology. This cynical fallacy falsely elevates the saying popularized by Carl Sagan, that “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof,” to an absolute law of logic.

So, I will post the Kentucky Study for the “extraordinary proof”:

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0806-vaccination-protection.html


30 posted on 10/04/2021 11:29:25 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

How do you compress 10-15 years of clinical trials into one year. Everyone involved with saying this clot shot is safe has a hand in genocide.


31 posted on 10/05/2021 1:58:40 AM PDT by Boomer (Leftism is a mental illness wrapped in a perverse ideology resulting in insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

32 posted on 10/05/2021 2:30:27 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Nobody is “gaslighting” anybody here. If these proposed mRNA vaccines finally establish a safe and effective track record, they will achieve a standard, traditional FDA vaccine approval.

In the absence of that they may never be approved They were explicitly released under an FDA EUA Emergency Use Authorization protocol that does not guarantee full FDA approval

Human Physiology may take years to fully reveal its secrets - which is why traditional vaccine development timelines have literally been decades. No amount of computerized data compression can realistically shorten that timeline very much


33 posted on 10/05/2021 3:50:01 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Natural immunity has no side effects.

The vaxxes have a bunch of short term and long term side effects.

I choose door #1.


34 posted on 10/05/2021 3:52:41 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Gaslighting?

You men gaslighting, as in insisting the bioweapon didn't come from a lab?

-These pharmaceutical korporations redefined a vaccine to fit these experimental treatments. The "new technology" is NOT a vaccine.
-The same governments and korporations involved in this banned gain-of-function experimentation that created the virus, and LIED about it, are supposed to be trusted with the "vaccine" for it?
-These same korporations intentionally removed their control groups.
-The "harmless piece of a spike protein" is clearly not harmless.
-The pharmaceutical korporations and governments are covering up cases of myocarditis, thrombosis, blood clots, and seizures.
-The Jim Jones Jab is tailored to one strain, and does trigger immunity to other variant strains
-The Jim Jones Jab requires "boosters" every 5-6 months. Real vaccines work for years, if not a lifetime.
-The body does NOT "create the same response that happens in a natural infection".
-As for actual vaccines, they often use a dead chain of the virus to allow your body to build antibodies without risk of being exposed to a live virus.
-The data points to the Jim Jones Jab is creating the mutant strains.
-The CDC is outright lying when they say, "COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of getting COVID-19 and helps protect you from severe illness." The data from Israel shows it INCREASES the risk of getting COVID.
-Natural immunity doesn't "work in conjunction with" the Jim Jones Jab, and "hybrid immunity" is sick propaganda. Individuals who had COVID, built natural immunity, and then took the Jim Jones Jab, later got COVID, pointing toward it working AGAINST natural immunity.
-Future infections won't be "milder than the last". The data points toward Antibody Dependent Enhancement and future infections of anything is worse.
-Those who take the Jim Jones Jab don't have "milder infections". They've been going to the hospital, or the morgue.
-The pharmaceutical korporations and governments are covering up the effectiveness of other treatments such as Ivermectin which has been used to success in Japan and India.
-The lockdown and "vaccine" diktat comparison between Sweden and Israel is damning. Israel mandated the "vaccines" and is now looking at a FOURTH shot. Sweden did not and their death rates have been consistently low.

35 posted on 10/05/2021 4:35:31 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tatown; Steven W.

Guessing, here, but breaking last night:

Sydney Powell is connecting the National Institute of Health (NIH) with a patent for “monitoring” elections.
(Not for manipulating the ballot counting process, or adjudicating ballots, but for monitoring.) Hmmm. This guy now retires.

This NIH director may know that connection has been made.

Sidney has been sued by Dominion, for defamation.

How do you bring evidence into the Court? Discovery.

As the defendant, Sydney has the right to bring evidence through *Discovery*, important for defending herself, her words as true, and exposing Dominion to prove it.


36 posted on 10/05/2021 6:46:31 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Publik Skules/Academia -> The Farm team for more Marxists coming. Infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

I really think the Kentucky study is among the worst offered by the CDC and is highly suspicious. I do think the two could work together but there is very little chance that natural immunity provides no protection in the way that the Kentucky study implies.

From their own conclusions:

“at least five limitations. First, reinfection was not confirmed through whole genome sequencing, which would be necessary to definitively prove that the reinfection was caused from a distinct virus relative to the first infection. Although in some cases the repeat positive test could be indicative of prolonged viral shedding or failure to clear the initial viral infection (9), given the time between initial and subsequent positive molecular tests among participants in this study, reinfection is the most likely explanation. Second, persons who have been vaccinated are possibly less likely to get tested. Therefore, the association of reinfection and lack of vaccination might be overestimated. Third, vaccine doses administered at federal or out-of-state sites are not typically entered in KYIR, so vaccination data are possibly missing for some persons in these analyses. In addition, inconsistencies in name and date of birth between KYIR and NEDSS might limit ability to match the two databases. Because case investigations include questions regarding vaccination, and KYIR might be updated during the case investigation process, vaccination data might be more likely to be missing for controls. Thus, the OR might be even more favorable for vaccination. Fourth, although case-patients and controls were matched based on age, sex, and date of initial infection, other unknown confounders might be present. Finally, this is a retrospective study design using data from a single state during a 2-month period; therefore, these findings cannot be used to infer causation. Additional prospective studies with larger populations are warranted to support these findings.”

Yes!

Absolutely a two month study of such a limited population is fairly ridiculous. 60 days for two infections? It is much more likely that these double infections simply did not clear the first infection. They concede that they did not verify these things with genetic testing. The limitations they concede to such as small study raise real questions as to why the CDC hinges their entire argument on this one study versus larger and longer studies like those in Israel that show clearly that natural immunity is powerful and enduring.


37 posted on 10/05/2021 8:20:04 AM PDT by lonestar67 (America is exceptional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tatown

1) Buy private island off a non-extradition coast.

2) Put affairs in order.

3) Resign...


38 posted on 10/05/2021 9:36:41 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold. --Matthew 24:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Great insight.


39 posted on 10/05/2021 10:26:54 AM PDT by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


40 posted on 10/05/2021 5:03:21 PM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson