Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Root Cause of China’s Shortage of Professional Talent
Epoch Times ^ | 10/02/2021 | Zhong Yuan

Posted on 10/02/2021 9:52:53 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Commentary

With China facing a shortage of professional talent, a specific conference was held to address the situation, which indicated a fundamental problem of the Chinese government.

From Sept. 27 to 28, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a Central Talent Work Conference. The importance of the conference was shown by the participation of all seven members of the Standing Committee of the Central Political Bureau of the CCP.

Given that its technology companies have been sanctioned one after another, the senior members of the CCP put forward the slogan of “independent innovation in science and technology.”

Despite this, Xi’s speech at the conference revealed the root cause of the predicament faced by the CCP—the shortage of professional talent.

Huawei and Meng Wanzhou

According to Xinhua News Agency, Xi Jinping stated: “The Party’s leadership in talent-related work has been comprehensively strengthened. The scale, effectiveness, and comparative advantages of our talent pool have been steadily increasing. Our nation already has a large-scale, outstanding, well-structured, and prominent talent pool.”

Given that the fields of science and technology in China have had no breakthroughs, the statement by Xi is clearly unconvincing. The CCP used to promote Huawei, a major Chinese multinational technology corporation, hoping that it would dominate the internet industry.

Nonetheless, the great ambition of Huawei was thwarted by the diplomatic disputes over microchips that are essential for the making of its electronic products.

On Sept. 25, Meng Wanzhou, Huawei chief financial officer who had admitted to using a Hong Kong shell company called Skycom to sell equipment to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions, arrived in China after spending three years under house arrest in Canada while fighting extradition to the United States.

Because Huawei’s 5G technology was developed by people who previously worked for Nortel Networks Corporation headquartered in Canada, Meng Wanzhou, who was thus valued by the CCP and living a luxurious life in Canada, is expected to not leak any more secrets of Huawei’s stealing intellectual property after returning to China.

Stolen Knowledge

The CCP’s lack of technological expertise can be seen in the speech given by Xi Jinping who said, “It is essential to raise our awareness of unexpected situations and focus more on the cultivation of our own talents.”

Xi’s statement inadvertently denies the aforementioned achievements in talent-related work and points out that the development of China’s science and technology over the past few decades was based on stolen Intel.

Once the thefts are interrupted, the CCP will encounter difficulties in no time. Can the CCP really cultivate its “own” talents despite having said it will do so?

“We have the largest higher education system in the world,” Xi said at the conference. “And the system is fully capable of producing a large number of talents and experts.”

The reality is that the CCP used to vigorously promote the “Thousand Talents Plan” in an attempt to steal advanced technologies from the United States and other Western countries on a larger scale.

Concerning the deterioration of the relations between China and the United States, Japan, and European countries, this plan is on the verge of termination.

Under the circumstances, a large number of Chinese students looking forward to studying in the United States have been denied a visa or repatriated to China because they were suspected of technical theft or being affiliated with the Chinese military.

The reason the CCP’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been censuring the United States is exactly because China’s higher education system cannot produce the professional talent it needs.

CCP Is the Arbiter of Talent

After mentioning a lot of clichés about talent-related works, Xi Jinping suddenly said, “We must establish a utilization mechanism of talents based on trust,” as reported by Xinhua News Agency.

Such a CCP-style approach indicates the crux of China’s talent-related problem, that is, the judgment of talent is based mainly on the trust of officials, not the abilities one has. To be recognized as talented in China, one must stand for and show loyalty to the CCP.

In China, only those who are recognized by CCP officials can be deemed “talented” and valued. As for the large number of real talented people who are unaware of politics, they can only step aside as no one will consult their opinions or ongoing projects. Should they disobey the unreasonable instructions of, or appear cleverer than, the CCP, they might even be ostracized or suppressed.

It is for these reasons that many Chinese with real abilities, who are commonly seen in the high-tech companies in the United States and other Western countries, were forced to leave China, a nation where they became useless. It seems impossible for the CCP, which has been adopting adverse policies, to retain and produce its own talented citizens.

“It is necessary to … be talent-oriented, trust talents, respect talents, treat talents kindly, and tolerate talents,” Xi Jinping emphasized in his speech, in which he then said in a contradictory manner: “To do a good job of talents, we must adhere to the correct political direction,” insisting that “the party must manage talents.”

It can thus be seen that the CCP’s political work of recruiting talent will continue as usual, and will end up in failure. The root cause of the CCP’s talent-related problem and its overall decline in economy, technology, and social system is that its senior officials have been demanding that “the party must manage everything, including talents.”

Conclusion

The United States and other Western countries have been decoupling from China, making the Chinese realize that the CCP’s so-called “system advantage” and “national governance” are factually incorrect.

While enthusiastically praising Xi Jinping’s speech, CCP mouthpiece Xinhua News Agency also published a commentary titled “Xin Zhiping: Reading the Successful Code of the Chinese Miracle,” which continues to promote the so-called “miracle” worked by the “strong leadership of the party.”

Be that as it may, the truth is, however, the opposite. The rapid economic and technological growth of China in the past few decades has mainly benefited from its close contact with the United States and other Western countries.

It is precisely because of this “strong leadership of the party,” manifesting in the CCP’s concealment and spread of the Coronavirus as well as its provocative “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy, that China is ostracized by the major countries of the world. The Chinese miracle then disappeared.

China’s development does require a large number of talented people. To have more of these talents stand out for China, the CCP must dispel its notion that “the party must manage everything, including talents” and build a proper system in which the real talents are in charge of the nation. Only by doing so can China return to the world stage in the near future.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; professionaltalent; shortage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2021 9:52:53 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tyrants will always have a problem keeping the best minds . The brain drain will flow to whatever place allows them to be free.


2 posted on 10/02/2021 10:03:34 PM PDT by Nateman (If the Left is not screaming , you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Great read. One can only hope it’s accurate.


3 posted on 10/02/2021 10:12:23 PM PDT by jcon40 (Machinery is only as good as its design and quality of parts. A citizen is only as good )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is the same problem it has always had for the past two millennia. Early in the common era, the Chinese had blast furnaces capable of casting tons of pig iron, they invented gun powder, movable type, paper, etc. The list of Chinese "firsts" in the history of technology is incredible.

But these inventions went nowhere because of the stultifying effects of an overweening and parasitic political culture that prohibited the accumulation and allocation of capital by fair, transparent rules.

The British East India company was chartered in 1600. It provided a pool of capital to undertake trade with the East Indies. It was remarkable because apart from the Crown charter it had no members of the nobility as sponsors or members. It was a purely bourgeois enterprise. Even today any large scale development in China is unthinkable without CCP involvement and graft.

4 posted on 10/02/2021 10:24:27 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jcon40

Hope is right, and with the Epoch Times we should be skeptical.

Chinese universities churn out engineers and scientists. Ours have turned to diversity studies. I don’t think that is how to compete.


5 posted on 10/02/2021 10:30:44 PM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wikipedia states that the Soviet Union lasted from 1922 to 1991; about 69 years.

The People's Republic of China came into being in 1949. It just might be that the existence of a non-merit-based nation might be limited to just three or four generations. China was 69 years old in 2018. We have plenty of problems in our own country but we just might see some interesting developments in China real soon now.

6 posted on 10/02/2021 10:33:28 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
As an additional note:

A vacuum occurs when you have an end result, but a severe lack of the building blocks to understand how you got the end result.

7 posted on 10/02/2021 10:35:32 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

There are 48 million K through 12 students in the USA.

There are about 230 million Chinese students at the same level.

I don’t know if that translates to about five times the amount of gifted kids to what we have?

The Chinese absolutely put more family emphasis on education than we do.

I don’t think they have a lot of immigrant minorities in their numbers either.

And the quality of the education is of course a worthy question.


8 posted on 10/02/2021 10:40:01 PM PDT by jcon40 (Machinery is only as good as its design and quality of parts. A citizen is only as good )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe
China basically stole our markets and our tech to get where they are today. They don't seem to do so well on their own as their experience trying to build top notch fighter engines shows.

My guess is that Xi and company are facing two critical problems. First, they created a credit bubble to fund continuous expansion over the past decade that dwarfs our mortgage crisis. Second, some Chinese companies (especially the tech sector) were achieving escape velocity from the CCP: they were big enough with enough foreign operations and access to foreign capital that their owners were beginning to ignore the CCP. Both problems must be causing a panic in the CCP. They are hoping that restoring a partial command economy can hold off the credit and business cycle implosion and restore control over breakaway Chinese capitalists. This may have also motivated the Hong Kong takeover. Over the long term China will face a stagnant GDP and declining population like Japan. But they will be dangerous as economic problems will motivate a desire for conflict with foreign devils to shift attention.

9 posted on 10/02/2021 10:47:28 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Early in the common era... Is that A.D. or B.C.? /s


10 posted on 10/02/2021 10:48:26 PM PDT by bleach (If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Interesting take. Thank you.


11 posted on 10/02/2021 10:53:09 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Check out the names of Stanford’s computer science grads every year.


12 posted on 10/02/2021 11:31:07 PM PDT by A strike ("Public Health" is 21st century murder by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"China’s development does require a large number of talented people. To have more of these talents stand out for China, the CCP must dispel its notion that “the party must manage everything, including talents” and build a proper system in which the real talents are in charge of the nation. Only by doing so can China return to the world stage in the near future."
Unfortunately, this will not happen under Xi and the current CCP leadership. In order for talented people to realize their potential, they must be able to ask questions during their education and professional lives. Questions are not asked because questions could lead to questioning the Party, endangering its survival. So students learn from the Party manual on their subject from a rotating random selection of teachers. This way, they save face in case something goes wrong - its not their fault. Should they deviate from planned procedures and something goes wrong, they are at fault and libel.

The only thing that matters to the CCP is its survival.

"The CCP wants to control everything and only allows pro-CCP organizations, even in foreign countries. If an organization is big enough, the CCP will try to control it; if it won't cooperate, the CCP will treat it as an enemy." - mainland Chinese overseas student.

War is a threat to the CCP survival, so they use other means.

See this excellent interview (but badly titled), on how the Chinese education system works, of a Brit who studied Medicine in China ; the procedures used in medicine are the same in all other professions and the pattern pervades the entire educational system.

The Most Disturbing Chinese Hospital Stories (2021) Youtube

13 posted on 10/03/2021 4:14:39 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m old enough to have very peripherally participated in one of Communist China’s previous attempt to control the minds of its educated elites. Shortly after the end of Chairman Mao’s disastrous “Great Leap Forward”, a college professor friend travelled to Communist China for a semester sabbatical. He had a very successful time there, and at the end, told his new found friends “Thanks for the great time. If you ever come to the US, I’ll find a place for you, too.”

Not long after, somewhat unexpectedly, NINE of them showed up at his door. He scrambled with some difficulty to find decent university positions for each of them. During this time, I attended a social/technical gathering that included several of these professors where they described their times in China during Mao’s “Great Leap Forward”.

All of the university staff in China, millions of them, who were not active members of the China Communist Party, were herded off to “agriculture camps”, These were in remote areas where they were told to make a wooden hoe, and grow their own food for themselves and their families. Most of these were people who had spent their entire lives far away from any kind of activities like this. Large numbers of them starved to death during this extended time.

So why did Mao murder hundreds of thousands of his educated elites, during a time when they were essential to grow his agenda? They didn’t adequately toe the lines of his Communist policies!

Clearly, Xi is now returning to the always necessary roots of Communism. Communism can never survive is a free society. State control is always necessary in a Communist country to keep the populace in check. Free thinking populations must be suppressed. It’s as simple as that.


14 posted on 10/03/2021 4:49:56 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Capitalism is what happens when you leave people alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

One point that came up in the China video is that the system the docs work under has them being immune from liability (no matter what bad result occurs) if they follow the official process exactly, but being totally liable if their professional judgment has them deviate from the standard.

We are seeing the same in the US. Docs and hospitals are immune if they follow CDC treatment protocol, but totally liable if they even mention HCQ or Ivermectin or any other “unapproved” treatment. And the crushing prospect of malpractice lawsuits have them toeing the line.


15 posted on 10/03/2021 6:40:05 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sticking your neck out just makes it easier for the axe


16 posted on 10/03/2021 6:45:01 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

There are many folks here who don’t believe it, but the next major economic crash will be worldwide.

That may bring down both China and the US at the same time.


17 posted on 10/03/2021 6:47:11 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jcon40

“The Chinese absolutely put more family emphasis on education than we do.”

Not exactly true. They put more emphasis on success in education. That creates a “by any means necessary” approach to education. Cheating is rampant. Testing is avoided because it creates an opportunity for failure. Make the deadline at any cost. So they have lots of engineers but their buildings fall down.


18 posted on 10/03/2021 6:49:48 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Punishment in all areas of science and engineering can also happen if there are party approved scientists and engineers leading large institutions.

They would hate young innovators who challenged their ideas—and would crush dissent if the culture allowed it.

This is happening now in both China and western societies.

The institutions have become too large, too top down, too intolerant of dissent within the ranks.....


19 posted on 10/03/2021 6:50:25 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

As you note, a smart young scientist would be a threat to the social status of the older established ones.


20 posted on 10/03/2021 7:31:04 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson