[Jamestown1630]

It’s a good idea to read the entire article - the title is kind of misleading. The author admits that a good number of those range between homeless/mentally ill, men who retired-early, stay-at-home dads, those living off the land, etc. (And I certainly wouldn't consider those last three to be 'non-working'.)

Noted toward the end: ‘Others are living non-working lives without burdening society or others, such as a fireman on early retirement (though some argue municipal employee pensions are too high), or an investor who made a ton of money in the market and called it quits, or maybe a wilderness guy living off the land in Alaska.'

But he also says, ‘It seems like working legally to provide for yourself in America is really just one option these days.’ So, I wonder whether our author thinks that those options under ‘non-working lives without burdening society’ are ‘legal’ or not...

Half-baked article containing lots of illogic.

[John Milner]

So in this age of gender equality to the ultimate, how is there an article about MEN not working?

Where’s the lazy B tches info???

[The_Media_never_lie]

(though some argue municipal employee pensions are too high),

---

The folks retire in the municipalities, and then relocate to low cost areas and live quite well.

[minnesota_bound]

#69 or an investor who made a ton of money in the market and called it quits

That will be me soon : )