Posted on 09/26/2021 9:21:26 AM PDT by george76
What the resident calls "my military" is being cleansed .. leaving the compliant and fearful.
...
Carter Ham was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.
Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to "assist and provide intelligence for" military forces ordered into action by Gen. Ham.
...
Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, notes how the White House fails to take action or investigate its own officials but finds it easy to fire military commanders "who have given their lives for their country." Vallely thinks he knows why this purge is happening.
"Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama's ideology," Vallely said. "The White House protects their own. That's why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and ObamaCare. He's intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged."
...
Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never waste a crisis."
For .. Obama, the military of a once-feared superpower is an anachronistic vestige of an America whose exceptionalism and world leadership require repeated apologies. It must be gutted and fundamentally transformed into a force wearing gender-neutral headgear only useful for holding the presidential umbrella when it rains. It is to be "his" military and used only for "his" purposes.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
Let’s GO!
“Ya’ll need to realize that Democrats are not Americans, they are Democrats, so when you elect them you must realize their loyalty is to the party and they will act accordingly.“
+infinity
We really need a “like” button on FR.
While we sit and watch
Does Investors Business Daily still have a Conservative editorial page?
I have not seen an IBD editorial posted on Free Republic for a long time.
Milley is a woke, liberal general so he may no longer even be making excuses; just doing what seems best for him to do at the moment.
I certainly don't remember reading of Milley justifying his actions in any meaningful sense of the word.
And now we have a defense bill with “red flag” laws for the military, and provisions banning 5th Amendment protections for them at courts martial. The SecDef’s plan to root out and fire white and otherwise “extremist” members is now free to roll, continuing the obama war on the US military.
You don't think Milley thought his actions were legal? And justifiable?
I'm not sure which actions you are referencing.
There is a report that Milley secretly contacted the Red Chinese and told them he would let them know in advance of any military action the U.S. was taking against them.
Further, it is reported the Commander-In-Chief did not know of Milley’s commitment to the Red Chinese.
If Milley thought his actions were legal and proper I don't see why he would keep them secret. Milley could have locked-in the covenant by announcing it publicly. But maybe not.
For some reason, Milley wanted our nuclear-armed adversaries to have more knowledge about the status or U.S. forces than his own countrymen.
Everyone he hired has to be purged.
Reportedly his peers in the Pentagon knew about it. Esper knew about it before he was fired. That doesn't sound secret to me.
For some reason, Milley wanted our nuclear-armed adversaries to have more knowledge about the status or U.S. forces than his own countrymen.
So you think that the average American should know all there is to know about what's going on in the Pentagon? Or are you referring to that select group that Milley felt he needed to keep in the dark?
It doesn’t matter what Milley thought. His actions were treasonous.
Now you have my interest. Just who was the “select group” you mention?
In Star Trek The Next Generation tv show almost all the admirals that Picard had to deal with were snippy women.
Trump and his inner circle. Haven't you been reading the accounts?
If what you say is true then Milley was disobeying Trump orders - unless Trump ordered Milley to keep important secrets from him (Trump). That last part seems unlikely.
That leads me to conclude Milley did not meet the DD test for subordinate conduct: “Right or wrong, the president is entitled to generals and admirals who obey the orders of the commander in chief.”
Which brings us back to your original comment, posted oh so long ago. Orders are to be obeyed, unless they are illegal and then must be disobeyed. If Milley disobeyed orders then was it because he believed them to be illegal and felt duty bound to disobey them? And if that is the case then to you support Milley's decision.
That leads me to conclude Milley did not meet the DD test for subordinate conduct: “Right or wrong, the president is entitled to generals and admirals who obey the orders of the commander in chief.
Unless, of course, Milley met the JD criteria for disobeying orders. Is that the case?
Looks like IBD editorials ended a few years a ago.
Jeffersondem’s well-crafted post was made in the context of your hastily written comment endorsing uncritically, perhaps unwittingly, conventional wisdom: “Right or wrong, the president is entitled to generals and admirals who obey the orders of the commander in chief.”
The controversy over obedience to authority has been an ongoing debate, and I don't mean just in 20th century Europe.
So much so that the Man himself had to set the thing straight: “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's.”
For those that still respect the Declaration of Independence, like Jeffersondem, they believe the Founding Fathers worked through the obedience issues beautifully and beneficially.
Now, about Mr. Milley. He was wrong to apologize for being seen on the street with his commander in chief when President Trump paid respect to that racially integrated church which hours earlier has been subject to a firebombing attack by night-riders.
President Trump did a lesser wrong by not firing Milley for politicizing the president's courtesy call. Had President Trump taken that precaution, Mr. Milley would not have been in a position to give so much war materiel to terrorists, or to make secret covenants with the Red Chinese.
When the rubber meets the road, there is fragging.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.