Posted on 09/25/2021 12:13:02 PM PDT by gattaca
Among a certain community of individual investors on TikTok, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s stock trading disclosures are a treasure trove. “Shouts out to Nancy Pelosi, the stock market’s biggest whale,” said user ‘ceowatchlist.’ Another said, “I’ve come to the conclusion that Nancy Pelosi is a psychic,” while adding that she is the “queen of investing.”
“She knew,” declared Chris Josephs, analyzing a particular trade in Pelosi’s financial disclosures. “And you would have known if you had followed her portfolio.”
Last year Josephs noticed that the trades, actually made by Pelosi’s investor husband and merely disclosed by the Speaker, were performing well.
Josephs is the co-founder of a company called Iris, which shows other people’s stock trades. In the last year and a half, he’s been taking advantage of a law called the Stock Act, which requires lawmakers to disclose stock trades and those of their spouses within 45 days.
Now on Josephs’ social investing platform, you can get a push notification every time Pelosi’s stock trading disclosures are released. He is personally investing when he sees which stocks are picked: “I’m at the point where if you can’t beat them, join them,” Josephs told NPR, adding that if he sees trades on her disclosures, “I typically do buy… the next one she does, I’m going to buy.”
A Pelosi spokesperson said that she does not personally own any stocks, and that the transactions are made by her husband. “The Speaker has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” said the spokesperson.
Still Josephs views trades by federal lawmakers as “smart money” worth following, and plans to track a large variety of politicians. “We don’t want this to… be a left vs right thing. We don’t really care. We just want to make money,” he said.
Pelosi is hardly the only lawmaker making these stock disclosures. So far this year, Senate and House members have filed more than 4,000 financial trading disclosures — with at least $315 million dollars of stocks and bonds bought or sold. That’s according to Tim Carambat, who in 2020 created and now maintains two public databases of lawmaker financial transactions — House Stock Watcher and Senate Stock Watcher. He says there is a significant following for his work.
“I knocked out a very, very simple version of the project in like a couple of hours. And I posted it actually to Reddit, where it gained some significant traction and people showed a lot of interest in it,” Carambat said.
Professor Dinesh Hasija, an assistant professor of strategic management at Augusta University, has been studying whether the market moves based on Congressional disclosures. His ongoing research suggests that it does.
“Investors perceive that senators may have insider information,” he said. “And we see abnormal positive returns when there’s a disclosure by a senator.”
In other words, Hasija’s research shows that after the disclosures are published, there’s a bump in the price of stocks bought by lawmakers.
At least one financial services consultant, Matthew Zwijacz, is planning to set up a financial instrument that automatically tracks Congressional stock picks, because, in his view, lawmakers are “probably privy to more information than just the general public.”
Both investors and government watchdogs are interested in these trades because of the possibility that lawmakers could use the private information they obtain through their jobs for money-making investment decisions.
“If the situation is that the public has lost so much trust in government that they think… the stock trades of members are based on corruption, and that [following that] corruption could benefit [them]. … We have a significant problem,” said Kedric Payne, Senior Director of Ethics at the Campaign Legal Center.
A surge of interest following Congressional financial disclosures came near the beginning of the COVID pandemic, when a flurry of reports indicated that lawmakers sold their stocks right before the financial crash.
NPR reported how Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr privately warned a small group of well-connected constituents in February 2020 about the dire effects of the coming pandemic. He sold up to $1.72 million worth of personal stocks on a single day that same month.
A bipartisan group of senators came under suspicion, including Sens. Dianne Feinstein, James Inhofe and Kelly Loeffler. After investigations by federal law enforcement, none were charged with insider trading — a very difficult charge to make against a sitting lawmaker.
Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat from Illinois, is part of a bipartisan group of House and Senate members who have introduced legislation banning lawmakers from owning individual stocks. He’s run up against a lot of opposition to the idea.
“As I understand it, one of the perks of being a member of Congress, especially from the late 1800s on, was to be able to trade on insider information. That was a perk of being in Congress. And that has got to come to an end,” Krishnamoorthi said.
Polling shows that there is wide support for enacting this prohibition. According to a survey done this year by Data for Progress, 67% of Americans believe federal lawmakers should not own individual stocks.
There’s a deep cynicism that forms the foundation of a trading strategy based on mimicking the stock picks of lawmakers and their spouses: the notion that politicians are corrupt, and you can’t trust them not to engage in insider trading — so if the information is public you might as well trade what they’re trading.
But despite all the skepticism about politicians and their ethical standards, the evidence doesn’t show that members of Congress make great stock pickers. While a 2004 paper found that senators generally outperformed the market, more recent academic studies in 2013 and over the last few years have suggested lawmakers are not good at picking stocks.
“Those papers have found that in fact, the trades made by senators have underperformed,” Hasija said.
Which means, if you ever take a stock tip from a lawmaker — cynicism aside — it might not be a very good trade.
Of course by following this advice to purchase stocks that Pelosi buys you are pumping up the very investments she has made. Hence, it becomes a “self-fulfilled prophecy”. So if you want to enrich Pelosi, then just go ahead and follow her lead. The better strategy in my opinion would be if you own anything she buys, then attempt a mass exodus from that stock and advise others likewise.
Enter Congress middle class.
Leave Congress a millionaire many times over.
".........government watchdogs are interested in these trades because of the possibility that lawmakers could use the private information they obtain through their jobs for money-making investment decisions."
Bump for later
Bkmrk
Correct . Problem is, it could be months before this information is brought forth. By then the advantage could be lost.
The politicians get the initial bump up in price and sell. They make the money and you lose when he stock then falls back. Robinhood is offering investors access to IPO’s just like insiders.
On the other hand if groups of investors know what their hated congress member has invested in and they themselves have bought those stocks...they can discomfit that congress person by mass selling those stocks and force the price down quickly forcing the congressman to endure a loss.
the reality is in a moral and just country, the people who are in leadership roles and their families should not be in investments during the time of their tenure. and probably for a few years afterwards.
Pelosi will not be happy. Capitalism hasn’t served her or Paul well enough. The little people will be punished for daring use the same insider trading info as she does.
bump
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.