Posted on 09/21/2021 2:51:22 AM PDT by Kaslin
Upon reading special counsel John Durham’s 27-page indictment of attorney Michael Sussman, I found myself asking, “Is there anything Perkins Coie lawyers would not do to keep their Democratic clients in power?” Thanks to Durham, we know they launched a cyberwar against candidate Donald Trump that makes their work on the Steele dossier seem half-hearted. What we need to know is whether their work in producing Barack Obama’s birth certificate was any more legit than these other misadventures.
As to Sussman, he stands accused of lying to the FBI, “to wit, on or about September 19, 2016, the defendant stated to the General Counsel of the FBI that he was not acting on behalf of any client in conveying particular allegations concerning a Presidential candidate, when in truth, and in fact, and as the defendant well knew, he was acting on behalf of specific clients, namely, Tech Executive-I and the Clinton Campaign.”
Durham could have summed up the charge in a page. Instead, he spent 27 pages outlining the skullduggery behind the deep state war on Donald Trump. According to Durham, Sussman worked with at least three high-tech firms, two university researchers, and several media outlets on a cybersmear campaign against candidate Trump that dwarfed the Steele dossier both in scope and in sophistication.
The Steele dossier was commissioned by Perkins Coie attorney Marc Elias, managed by Fusion GPS, and executed by international man of mystery, Christopher Steele. Elias makes a cameo appearance in the Durham report as “campaign lawyer 1” as does Fusion GPS, here labeled “U.S. Investigative Firm.”
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
-PJ
bump
Cashill may not have been a birther, but he certainly was a fellow traveler, especially when he had a book to hawk. And now he has a book to hawk.
Not sure this is what the “when” is getting at, but some think that communist Frank Marshall got his white CIA friend’s daughter pregnant at 17. Barack Obama, Sr/exchange student was not the baby daddy, just a beard. If true, it solve Barack H. Obama, II’s natural born citizen problem, but proves his life story a gigantic fraud, and all the birth certificate machination to be a criminal conspiracy.
“:: I don’t understand how the date of Obama’s birth would make a difference ::”
couldn’t the date on the birth certificate relate to where he actually was when he was born? indicating that on that date he was not in the United States?
The date on the BC matters because his mother was friends with Malcolm X (who could be his twin) but the dems say that he could not be his father because they were not ‘together’ at the proper time period.
They faked the BC why not fake the date too.
What birth certificate?
He was born on a couch in the ghetto outside Vancouver CA.
There is a fake birth cert; I didn’t know he was born on a couch, I’ve wondered if he had a real Canadian one.
:: he was born on a couch ::
speculation.
Midwife would have reported it.
There are thousands of people in the world, living in poverty, that don’t have BCs.
Tribal living.
I remember, too.
Oh! And....who could forget the kerning. That was an immediate tip off.
The birth certificate was sooooo poorly done it was as if they did a poor job deliberately.
The meaning of the word "conspiracy" does not revolve around the legality of the effort. People can conspire to do something legal, and yet it is still a conspiracy.
With the creative judges and lawyers in Washington DC, whether something is legal or illegal is simply a matter of opinion and the decision usually revolves around whose ox is getting gored.
Antifa didn't riot, but people protesting election fraud did?
Bullsh*t.
Actual conspiracies do in fact abound. The Tuskegee incident where they denied medical services to black men is an example. There are ridiculous numbers of examples of real actual conspiracies.
It is literally the definition of conspiracy.
Firstly you are burying the lede here by focusing on the meaning of the word "conspiracy", and secondly, the definition of the word encompasses acting in harmony to a common end, even if that end is not illegal.
You also ignore my point about illegality being whatever a biased court says it is. If the legal system won't recognize illegality, such as in the case of Antifa, BLM or vote rigging, than for all intents and purposes what they have done isn't "illegal", even though it clearly is illegal.
So like, running a political campaign is a conspiracy...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.