Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the US should offer to buy France's submarines for Vietnam
Washington Examiner ^ | September 19, 2021 | Tom Rogan

Posted on 09/19/2021 12:10:32 PM PDT by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: george76
This is a really dumb idea floated in the OP article.

Another dumb aspect to this switcher-roo by Australia is that Australia apparently did not notify France of reaching a terminal boiling point on their dissatisfaction with ballooning cost for the package of submarines. If accurate, this is a royal screw up. I have read that the cost originally was about $50 billion and has increased to about $80 billion with the delivery date slipping by several years.

Something I have occasionally been able to put into commercial contracts for services and long lead time equipment are penalty and reward clauses. Exceed a benchmark and earn a bonus to the contract. Miss the benchmark and incur a reduction in $$$ owed. People and companies work their butt off when chasing a bonus on top of the base amount.

61 posted on 09/19/2021 4:23:56 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Clever use of ‘real politik’, but I don’t like giving anything to communist governments. I’d nix it.


62 posted on 09/19/2021 4:24:53 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner (Seek you first the kingdom of God, and all things will be given to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

People should understand that the French product was not only a turkey but its delivery date was postponed many times, and the subs probably would not have been delivered before 2030.


63 posted on 09/19/2021 5:06:23 PM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Because Vietnam has such a rich submariner history. Not worth it.

If Vietnam cannot be convinced to cough up the money and buy their own to protect their own economic rights, then come up with a cheap, effective, and right now plan— until US/UK can deliver 8 boats.

There are too many subs in Hawaii. They are too far from the fight and AUS needs subs now. Homeport 6 SSNs in AUS with the understanding husbanding services will be secured for port calls to Vietnam, Singapore, PI, Japan, S Korea. Force AUS with a sweetheart deal for home-porting with US Marines.

Move a SSGN to Hawaii. Shocked PACOM doesn’t have one.

That fixes everything to include shorter deployments for the SSNs. It’s cheaper, it pisses China off, and it alleviates the likelihood of Hawaii tipping over due to an overabundance of military and families. Hank Johnson (D-GA) will be relieved.


64 posted on 09/19/2021 5:36:42 PM PDT by Salvavida (We must win the COUNTY if we want to win the country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

They probably didn’t need submarines until China started building islands off their coast.


65 posted on 09/19/2021 5:42:01 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bingo! Winner!

Vietnam owes us money...


66 posted on 09/19/2021 7:04:59 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Let’s buy em some snails!


67 posted on 09/19/2021 7:10:47 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: george76

You don’t need nuclear subs unless you have a blue water navy. If you don’t have a blue water navy, Air Independent Propulsion is a much better option because it matches nuclear in every category except endurance but only costs a fraction of what nuclear does to buy and maintain.

And Vietnam’s navy is strictly brown water.

Vietnam’s only submarines at present are Kilo-class Soviet diesel-electric boats armed with little more than short-range anti-ship and ship-to-shore cruise missiles, nothing that justifies (or benefits from) a switch to nuclear. So if they bought nuclear boats that would more or less obligate them to also spend to get (or invent) sub-launched ballistic missiles or sub-launched cruise missiles.

Not only that, Vietnam created its own governmental atomic energy agency in 1976 with the intention of electrifying the country with nuclear power plants. But they abandoned the project in 2016 because they finally figured out what should have been obvious in 1976: there are cheaper ways to make electricity on the limited scale they need it than with nuclear power plants.

Which means Vietnam doesn’t have any nuclear reactors. ZERO. Which means they would lack the means to produce fuel for their White Elephant nuclear submarine.

So imagine that your most powerful instrument of war can’t serve its primary role unless some other country agrees to supply you with fuel and munitions.

And on top of that, adding a nuclear sub to your armada definitely will raise the profile of your fleet, and the nuclear pigboat automatically becomes the first vessel any sufficiently sophisticated adversary would target if hostilities should erupt. Which offsets the dependency on foreign aid for munitions and fuel, because it likely will be the first vessel sunk.

I doubt the Vietnamese are that stupid.


68 posted on 09/20/2021 2:17:03 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
Because Vietnam has such a rich submariner history. Not worth it.

Vietnam has six conventional subs, Russian Kilos. They've been operating them for some time now.

They are too far from the fight and AUS needs subs now.

There are four submarines homeported in Guam. Just increase that number.

Move a SSGN to Hawaii. Shocked PACOM doesn’t have one.

They have two. USS Ohio and USS Michigan. Homeported in Bangor.

69 posted on 09/20/2021 2:32:46 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: george76

Just NO.


70 posted on 09/20/2021 10:03:43 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson