Posted on 09/19/2021 10:04:08 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Could not be clearer that the people in charge of our country regard covid solely as a means of control, and the introduction of death and sickness as a punishment for disobedience.
Instead of discarding the vaccines, they should send them to areas where they are needed.
There are thousands of people in "Lock-down" Australia who are not vaccinated and who want the "jab",
but there are insufficient quantities currently available.
Melbourne currently has raised the distance one can travel from their homes to 10 kilometers,
and restrict the number of people in a group to four people,
and increased the distance of those who venture outside to four hours for food, pharmacy, doctor appointments.
Teachers are limited to zoom like classes by video conferencing
If we hadn’t taken the foolish step of “vaccinating” in the midst of a pandemic, this virus would be gone by now. We were warned.
If only you were in charge the whole plandemic would be much better controlled.
Yup - especially a non-sterilizing vaccine.
By the time they started using vaxxes, most people has natural immunity due to not shutting things down.
has=had
Several possible reasons for not donating surplus vaccines to areas with shortages.
Shelf life ... Swedish vaccines may have reached or were about to reach honest expiration dates in transit.
And cold storage requirements. Transporting requires very strict chain of cold temperature to insure efficacy. Recall the 15-20 million doses that were destroyed due to poor handling.
From CDC
“COVID-19 vaccine products may impact the types of vaccine storage units and temperature monitoring devices used to maintain the cold chain, including the use of ultra-cold storage. Temperature ranges for COVID-19 vaccines may also differ from those for other vaccines.”
source:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/admin/storage/toolkit/storage-handling-toolkit.pdf
Given Sweden’s extensive history of good Samaritan foreign aid programs, I believe they would have made the donatation if vacvines were viable.
My guess is that once the Vaxes is distributed, it's uneconomical to "undistribute" them.
For under-vaccinated locales, the cheapest alternative is to buy in bulk from the manufacturer and then use local channels to deliver individual doses down to the end users.
In epidemiology if “test and slaughter” isn’t an option then the disease has to run its course. Vaccination in the middle of an epidemic historically has been a fool’s effort.
Who says they won't consider it as an option?
Sweden went against the grain and avoided lockdowns while every other Western nation ridiculed them and accused them of killing off their population. They advocated voluntary social-distancing rules and not closing schools but banning gatherings of more than 50 people. They achieved extremely low daily death counts, often zero, ahead of all of the nations who thought lockdowns were the way to go. They ranked only 38th as the most vaccinated in the world at 62.3% being fully-vaxxed. As of Sept 2021, Sweden has had 143.65 deaths / 100,000 people Vs 204.92 for USA, 202.46 for UK, 173.90 for France, 222.02 for Belgium and 182.22 for Spain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country).
Post 14 is correct as to what Sweden did right. Use distance and self-isolation to mitigate the spread. Take extra measures to keep the old folks and immune deficient away from the sick spreaders. As the young and healthy under 65 are likely to get the virus and live, you end up with good herd immunity.
The vaccines only give a lesser amount of protection which lessens over the months. Post illness immunity is stronger and longer lasting. Of course, the drug companies earn less and have less to pay off the politicians.
Uh Oh, if they go with the vaccine their cases will sky rocket (prediction)
Does this guy ever write something that is even remotely factually accurate? Sweden’s death rate per capita was much higher than other nations, it did in fact impose considerable restrictions, and its decline coincided with a high vaccination rate...which he calls a “flaw.” No doubt their current state also includes herd immunity not just from any effect of the vaccines, but from more natural infections which took place - time will tell long term if this results in the numbers evens out with the other countries’ stats, but we aren’t there yet to have that data.
How many different IDs do you post under?
“Sweden went against the grain and avoided lockdowns while every other Western nation ridiculed them and accused them of killing off their population.”
Thanks for posting this. It pretty much tells you all you need to know about how to manage a pandemic SUCCESSFULLY.
Sweden pretty much let the FauciFlu take its course an had no greater mortality rate than countries that engaged in frantic politicomedcal whack-a-mole. Now most of the population has natural immunity and will not be affected by various variants and is not facing a pandemic of heart attacks in a year or three.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.