Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

4.6 tons and they still couldn’t bring the buildings down right.


18 posted on 09/17/2021 10:39:19 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

Disagree. They were probably brought down at an angle due to close proximity of other buildings they wanted to preserve.


21 posted on 09/17/2021 10:53:45 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

Disagree. They were probably brought down at an angle due to close proximity of other buildings they wanted to preserve.


24 posted on 09/17/2021 11:04:54 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

There’s nothing that says a controlled demolition has to come straight down. The important part is for it to not land on something you don’t want to damage. If you’ve got a big field of nothing sideways is easier and faster. There’s plenty of controlled demolitions that go timber instead of straight down.


54 posted on 09/18/2021 7:42:16 AM PDT by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson