Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

Surprised the NYT investigated at all, but more surprised at all the ‘inside’ info they were given. The people on the inside who leaked info must be angry about the handling of the withdrawal.
Makes you wonder if the NYT main interest/purpose is getting Harris to be president.


11 posted on 09/12/2021 6:23:06 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Warning: Accused of being a radical militarist. Approach with caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nuconvert

The idea of actually consciously wanting Harris to be POTUS is frightening. How can she do even worse than Biden? Yes, she can. But how?

Will she unilaterally withdraw all American forces from Germany and have the Nazis come back into power? Will she post nuclear secrets in her on-line cookbook? Post a presidential porn video?


13 posted on 09/12/2021 6:30:20 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Hard times: hard men. Hard men: soft times. Soft times: soft men. Soft men: hard times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

NYT reported it so they can say they reported it.

You’ll not hear Biden have to explain it, nor will Biden be asked why he was scheduled to speak yesterday but didn’t.


18 posted on 09/12/2021 7:33:47 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods ( comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson