Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
The law says that OSHA must determine that there’s a “grave danger” to employees

The fatality rate is extremely low for all age groups. If you want to look at age groups that have slightly elevated fatality rates, then you are looking at very old people who are almost certainly retired.

The people who are in the work place are barely at any risk at all.

Jab 100% of the population? Because of this "grave danger"?

I don't see it.

6 posted on 09/11/2021 6:01:55 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (China is like the Third Reich. We are Mussolini's Italy. A weaker, Jr partner, good at losing wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Ping for later.


7 posted on 09/11/2021 6:07:51 PM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

People that work remotely have zero danger, but they are covered by the suggested rule.


13 posted on 09/11/2021 6:38:44 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

The fatality rate is extremely low for all age groups

But what if the fatality rate is 1 in 450 adults, and the disability rate is 10-20% in hospitalized? How does one legally define ‘low’ or ‘extremely low’ ?

669,989 x 4.5 = 301,495,050
over 2 million hospitalized x 10% = 200,000 addl disabled


19 posted on 09/11/2021 7:24:49 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson