Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montana Moves to Control Burgeoning Wolf Population with Expanded Hunting
AmmoLand ^ | 8 September, 2021 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 09/10/2021 7:11:56 AM PDT by marktwain

Wolves from a game camera in Wisconsin, courtesy Dean Weingarten

On 20 August 2021, the Montana Fish & Wildlife Commission voted to follow the intent of bill SB314, passed by the legislature and signed into law by Governor Greg Gianforte, on 30 April 2021.  SB314 was passed with the goal of reducing the wolf population while maintaining a minimum of 15 breeding pairs or 300 wolves in Montana. The 15 breeding pairs or 300 wolves are mandated to keep the wolf in Montana from being re-listed as an endangered species by the Federal government.

Re-listing would remove management of the wolf population from state control.  The bill passed 62 to 35 in the House, 29 to 20 in the Senate, and was signed by Montana Governor Greg Gianforte on 30 April 2021.  From ktvq.com:

After a public comment period that drew more than 26,000 comments, the Montana Fish & Wildlife Commission at its August 20 meeting adopted several changes to the 2021/2022 wolf hunting and trapping regulations.

Changes include eliminating quotas, increasing the number of wolf trapping and hunting licenses allowed for individual hunters, extending wolf trapping seasons, and the allowance of snares for trapping wolves.

Here is a summation of the rule changes, from a transcript of the Commission adoption of Wolf Harvest rules for 2021-2022.

There is no quota for the number of wolves to be harvested. A review of the harvest by the Fish & Wildlife Commission is required when 450 wolves are reported as taken. Another review will be triggered whenever an additional 50 wolves are harvested.

Wolf trappers are allowed a total of 10 wolves for the season. Wolf hunters have to buy a license for each wolf taken,

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: fishwildlife; hunt; montana; wildlife; wolf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
When states are allowed to manage predator populations, they make reasonable decisions based on input from the state residents, who are affected.

Many federal decisions are based upon input from people who do not have to live with the predators.

1 posted on 09/10/2021 7:11:56 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Good news.


2 posted on 09/10/2021 7:17:00 AM PDT by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBB333

I’m ok with protecting predators. Having said that I do believe ranchers should be compensated for predator kills.


3 posted on 09/10/2021 7:20:58 AM PDT by snoringbear (,W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Many federal decisions are based upon input from people who do not have to live with the predators.”

Many state decisions are based on input from people who do not have to live with the predators also.

The liberal pukes in Ann Arbor and Detoilet don’t have to deal with the wolves up north in the UP.


4 posted on 09/10/2021 7:24:55 AM PDT by Beagle8U ("Jim Acosta pissed in the press pool.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

I’m OK with killing them on sight.


5 posted on 09/10/2021 7:27:42 AM PDT by Beagle8U ("Jim Acosta pissed in the press pool.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

6 posted on 09/10/2021 7:33:03 AM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
First time I scanned the header for this article I thought it read: Montana Moves to Control Burgeoning White Population with Expanded Hunting

I've just been having some strange nightmares lately.

7 posted on 09/10/2021 7:33:45 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Montana Fish & Wildlife Commission voted to follow the intent of bill SB314, passed by the legislature and signed into law by Governor

They voted to follow the law?

8 posted on 09/10/2021 7:35:25 AM PDT by Pollard (#*&% Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Hm, trapping and using wolves as a business model.

I would suppose wolves eat coyotes, deer and Canada geese?

Thinking rent-a-wolf with a shock collar, set to the perimeters of a farm.

I’ll keep the pets in.


9 posted on 09/10/2021 7:36:02 AM PDT by jcon40 (Machinery is only as good as its design and quality of parts. A citizen is only as good as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollard
They voted to follow the law?

Yes.

Apparently, many found their action to be controversial.

10 posted on 09/10/2021 7:37:25 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

“...Having said that I do believe ranchers should be compensated for predator kills.”

Here in Montana there is a fund for just this very thing. It had to be put in place in order for the wolf to be reintroduced BACK into Montana, politically.


11 posted on 09/10/2021 7:41:14 AM PDT by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BBB333

They didn’t “reintroduce” wolves. There are several different species of wolves. The species they inserted into Montana were Canadian Gray wolves which are larger than the species that was there.

BTW - what they did was illegal. But the Feds in concert with environmentalist wackos got away with it.
https://www.huntingfishing.com/index.php/canadian-wolves-got-yellowstone/


12 posted on 09/10/2021 7:47:12 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Fortunately wolves are not a problem in Texas, but we do have coyotes and feral hogs, both a big problem. Wolves have been gone or mostly gone for a long time.

Coyotes are a problem though, they will wipe out your chickens in no time if they can find a way inside the fence. Hogs do a lot of damage to crops every year, and they have rooted in my yard several times, the last time they did it I watched 3 roam across the yard, and before I could get inside and grab my 243, they were gone again and had rooted up a patch of my mother’s yard you could park 2 cars in.

A neighbor has been losing chickens to the coyotes for a long time, and I saw 2 run across the yard a month ago. Couldn’t make it outside with my 22 pistol (all I had with me) before they disappeared.

Both coyotes and feral hogs are considered non game animals, and pests, legal to hunt any time but a hunting license is required. No bag limits. Hogs are often hunted at night, when they roam around more. About 30 years ago, Texas had a bounty on coyotes, I think it was 2 bucks per ear. You bring in just one ear off every animal you take, they would pay 2 bucks each, coyotes were that big a problem.

I’ve heard that in west texas they sometimes organize large rabbit hunts, to thin out the thousands of rabbits that sometimes beccome serious pests, when they attain those numbers. No natural predators, or few, not many people hunting them, they sometimes become such pests mass hunts have to be organized.

I read an article not long ago, probably here on FR, about the organized helicopter hunts for feral hogs. They have been a big problem for years, millions live in Texas.

Last time I saw any hogs around my neighborhood, I saw 4 or 5 adults and at least 4 young about 100 yards away, in the edge of a large patch of woods. Some of them are huge, probably close to the 400 pound mark. I used to work in cattle auctions, where hogs are brought in too, so I have a good general idea of the size/weight ratio. 300 pounds is a very large animal, and they are dangerous if they get mad or cornered. Don’t even get close to a 300lb sow with 3 or 4 little ones...bad idea...hogs in cattle auctions put me on the fence more than cows did by far. Most of the time your only option is to hop on top of the fence and let it run by...all wooden fences.

About 2 years ago one of them, about a 300 pounder, decided to create a nice wallow under my mother’s house next door, (unoccupied) and broke every water pipe under there. I had to turn all the water off until I found where the actual leak was, which is when I found the hog wallow, and of course replace all the pipes, and had to shoot the damn thing to get it out of our yard, it had decided to live there. There is still a depression over a foot deep and about 5 feet long by 3 feet wide under the house. 3 weeks after I shot the thing it was still too wet to get underneath and work on pipes. The day I found it no way, mud puddle over a foot deep.


13 posted on 09/10/2021 8:20:23 AM PDT by Paleo Pete (The slave does not dream of freedom, the slave dreams of being master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jcon40
I would suppose wolves eat coyotes, deer and Canada geese?
If wolves are hungry enough, they will kill and eat each other. I've seen direct evidence of it in Alaska.
14 posted on 09/10/2021 8:54:39 AM PDT by dainbramaged (I've got a hat, a coat and a gun. That's it. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I wish the word ‘harvested’ was not used. They are not a crop : )
Just say kill. It is concise and it is what needs to be done or you will have them as a bigger problem then the coyotes in your neighborhood.


15 posted on 09/10/2021 9:16:41 AM PDT by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Bumper:

Smoke A Pack A Day


16 posted on 09/10/2021 9:26:26 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Many federal decisions are based upon input from people who do not have to live with the predators.”

A profound statement...applies to city, state, and local governments, as well! (and not just regarding actual wildlife)


17 posted on 09/10/2021 9:35:08 AM PDT by Fireone (When they pry them from my cold, dead, unvaccinated hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varda

“They didn’t “reintroduce” wolves”

YES they did. The wolf was hunted to extinction. It was a good thing


18 posted on 09/10/2021 9:36:49 AM PDT by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BBB333

My point was that they introduced a species not native to Montana. Wolves is a generic term.


19 posted on 09/10/2021 9:54:27 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

But not if the ranchers are using federal land.


20 posted on 09/10/2021 10:34:51 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson