Unreal
1 posted on
09/09/2021 12:42:33 PM PDT by
rarestia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: All
To: rarestia
There’s a First Amendment right to riot?
Cool.
3 posted on
09/09/2021 12:44:50 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: rarestia
On February 16, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Walker to serve as District Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. I’m sure linda and mitch voted to confirm.
4 posted on
09/09/2021 12:45:19 PM PDT by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths. )
To: rarestia
Sounds like it’s a good time to have a riot outside of the judges home.
5 posted on
09/09/2021 12:45:44 PM PDT by
PJBankard
(Heaven has strict immigration policies. Hell has open borders.)
To: rarestia
6 posted on
09/09/2021 12:45:50 PM PDT by
Fido969
(45 is Superman!)
To: rarestia
So you can riot in CA, OR, WA, MN and now FL but not DC?
Liberal-Think is so confusing.
7 posted on
09/09/2021 12:45:52 PM PDT by
Zathras
To: rarestia
DISTRICT Judge.
Appeal the SNOT out of this decision.
8 posted on
09/09/2021 12:46:00 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
To: rarestia
Chief Federal District Judge Mark Walker said the groups who brought the lawsuit demonstrated that the law chilled protest activities since it was enacted, because "the challenged law's confusing definition of 'riot' fails to give their members sufficient notice of what is prohibited or when they could be subject to arrest, such that their members do not wish to participate in future protests or have ceased organizing protests altogether." You know, an enterprising defense attorney for the Jan 6th political prisoners could cite this now.
10 posted on
09/09/2021 12:47:38 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
To: rarestia
"the challenged law's confusing definition of 'riot' ..."What is the law's definition of 'riot?'
15 posted on
09/09/2021 12:56:48 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Resistance is not futile!)
To: rarestia
the challenged law's confusing definition of 'riot' This is sea lawyering. (its not defined in the law, but Websters is pretty clear as to meaning in this case - protest with violence). Easy to fix one of two ways. Go back and define 'riot' in the law, or let it appeal up the chain where a more sane court will slap down this injunction.
16 posted on
09/09/2021 12:59:15 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
To: rarestia
Let’s start a riot at the judges home, see what he thinks then.
18 posted on
09/09/2021 1:05:09 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(I'll wear a mask when Dr. Fraudchi shuts the hell up.)
To: rarestia
19 posted on
09/09/2021 1:10:27 PM PDT by
fwdude
(If you don’t think you are in a battle w/ the culture for your children then you are already losing.)
To: rarestia
“Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon . . . .”
21 posted on
09/09/2021 1:12:50 PM PDT by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: rarestia
You loot, we shoot. I don’t care the definition of a riot.
22 posted on
09/09/2021 1:14:43 PM PDT by
CodeToad
To: rarestia; JulieRNR21; Travis McGee; AAABEST; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; ...
Another Obama-planted activist 'judge'.
I am so surprised.
Florida Freeper I'm compiling a list of FReepers interested in Florida-related topics.
If you want to be added, please FReepMail me.
25 posted on
09/09/2021 1:46:11 PM PDT by
Joe Brower
("Might we not live in a nobler dream than this?" -- John Ruskin)
To: rarestia
“”the challenged law’s confusing definition of ‘riot’ fails to give their members sufficient notice of what is prohibited or when they could be subject to arrest, such that their members do not wish to participate in future protests or have ceased organizing protests altogether.””
NP. Update the legislation to clarify.
To: rarestia
Not to worry, it’s another obama judge.
Obama hacks....I mean judges....get overturned 85% of the
time by higher courts.
Again though, another radicalized commie democrat judge
trying to empower the ability for domestic terrorist groups
blm and antifa.
This obama appointed scumbag is greenlighting leftist violence.
What a surprise.
27 posted on
09/09/2021 2:29:28 PM PDT by
fatman6502002
((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
To: rarestia
Oh, great. Looking forward to my new state having riots in Tampa, Miami-Dade, Orlando, Tallahassee, etc.
To: rarestia
This hack is an Obama appointee.
32 posted on
09/09/2021 3:30:26 PM PDT by
Kazan
To: rarestia
Expected, will be appealed and overturned.
33 posted on
09/09/2021 3:52:06 PM PDT by
Basket_of_Deplorables
(Convention Of States is our only hope now! Desantis 2024!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson