Posted on 08/26/2021 11:48:23 AM PDT by NoLibZone
See also
The United States government says the people of the Kabul airport are safe and that unknown Americans are being harmed.
There are plenty, they are called parking lots and road ways.
you forgot the html tags for sarcasm.
otherwise, people are going to think you’re a moron.
They are grubering the news and relying on the stupidity of the voters to get people vaccinated to make Biden look good by meeting his target.
-PJ
Agree with that
I am utterly amazed at how many Freepers trust the Biden administration.
They are not Freepers. They are rejects from the Democrat Underground.
There is a legal distinction here. Legally there are two different product although they are identical in composition: 1) the Pfizer vaccine that is under a Emergency Use Authorization, and 2) the licensed COMIRNATY vaccine that is FDA approved. Although they are identical products, legally if you are vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine you cannot sue for any adverse effects since it is administered under a EUA. You will only be able to sue for adverse effects if you are vaccinated with the FDA approved COMIRNATY vaccine, but this is not yet available. Thus the FDA can say that the form of the vaccine has been approved and yet still shield Pfizer from product liability lawsuits.
If something isn’t “available yet”. Then how can it be approved?
No. I didn't trust the FDA, CDC, WHO etc even when it was a Trump admin and I'm not big on stupid high school level word play so don't bother calling it the Trump vaccine either.
I have no intention of taking the jab and have the Ivermectin horse paste "as a dewormer" dosage converted to human dosage as either a covid preventative or as a treatment on my profile page.
I'm just saying that the FDA is the approving body for drugs and vaxxes and if they say it's FDA approved, it's FDA approved. That is the silly argument going on here, that FDA saying it's FDA approved is not real. They are the authority having jurisdiction. If they say they approved it, they approved it.
It's just that a few right leaning news blogs can't understand the language of the FDA's announcement and want to try and play the gotcha game for clicks and naive conservatives fall for it every time. That and people who've become irrelevant like Bannon and Malone, are trying to make a living any way they can. Dr Malone says he contracts for the US government but has been working full time doing podcasts and video interviews so I have a feeling he has no real job at this point.
Again, if the FDA says it's FDA approved, it's FDA approved, period. If some people can't understand the FDA wording, that changes nothing. Fedgov, businesses and some states are going with it. That's just the reality.
you forgot the html tags for sarcasm.
otherwise, people are going to think you’re a moron.
*********************************************************
Now that is funny.
Freerepublic has never been more divided and warped than over the vaccine issue and Covid in general. There is a bottom line and that there is something terribly wrong with all of this. Simply put,if Trump was in a second term,NONE of this would be happening......NONE. It doesn’t change my feeling about getting jabbed but the truth and transparency makes life easier.
Look up the PREP Act.
Under a medical emergency, vax companies cannot be sued. I do believe Trump declared a medical emergency so he could do things like stop travel from certain countries and I doubt that emergency declaration has been rescinded.
I don’t have to worry about being able to sue because I have no intention of getting it.
OMG….is this saying that there are TWO Pfizer vaccines?
The EUA from last year, and something new? “BNT162B2” vs “COMIRNATY”?
If so this is completely misleading.
Some people lack the reading comprehension skills to understand the FDA’s wording. I’ve explained it a few times but I’m done with trying to convince thick headed people.
If the FDA says it’s FDA approved, then it’s FDA approved and if that’s good enough for fedgov, CDC, businesses and some state health depts, that’s all that matters.
What some right leaning blog or unemployed Dr or podcast personality trying to remain relevant says means nothing.
You would think people would have figured that out in the past 4-5 years.
Who’s in jail?
Who’s in power?
From the Pfizer EUA product Patient Consent Form:
“ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (INITIAL EACH STATEMENT):
....
The recipient or their caregiver has the option to accept or refuse Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.”
http://www.co.fannin.tx.us/upload/page/10318/docs/Pfizer/Pfizer%20Consent%20Form%20-%20Fillable.pdf
Those under a DoD or other employer mandate can’t get the EUA vaccine product without lying.
They are going to ship the approved product to make the mandates work and also try to get rid of the older product to people that have an still have the option to get it.
Speaking of the PREP Act, I’ll just toss this bit of good news in...
Holy merde. Check this out...
“...added a third method of distribution to provide liability protections for, among other things, private distribution channels; made explicit that there can be situations where not administering a covered countermeasure to a particular individual can fall within the PREP Act and the Declaration’s liability protections...”
Does that mean what I think it means?!
To tie in with what Barnes Law said, my question is:
If they approved the Pfizer, and not Moderna and J&J, does that mean they can’t use Moderna and J&J?
And does the EUA for Moderna and J&J negate using the Pfizer?
Section IV. Limited Immunity
The Secretary must also state that
liability protections available under the
PREP Act are in effect with respect to
the Recommended Activities. These
liability protections provide that,
‘‘[s]ubject to other provisions of [the
PREP Act], a covered person shall be
immune from suit and liability under
federal and state law with respect to all
claims for loss caused by, arising out of,
relating to, or resulting from the
administration to or use by an
individual of a covered countermeasure
if a Declaration has been issued with
respect to such countermeasure.’’ In
Section IV of the Declaration, the
Secretary states that liability protections
are in effect with respect to the
Recommended Activities. ...
...A qualified pandemic or epidemic
product means a drug or device, as
defined in the FD&C Act or a biological
product, as defined in the PHS Act that
is (i) manufactured, used, designed,
developed, modified, licensed or
procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent,
treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic or
limit the harm such a pandemic or
epidemic might otherwise cause; (ii)
manufactured, used, designed,
developed, modified, licensed, or
procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent,
treat, or cure a serious or lifethreatening disease or condition caused
by such a drug, biological product, or
device; (iii) or a product or technology
intended to enhance the use or effect of
such a drug, biological product, or
device.
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 17, 2020 / Notices
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-03-17/pdf/2020-05484.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.