Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

Pelosi wouldn’t be much closer than she is now. The new President has to a appoint a VP, and while that requires confirmation by the Senate, I think that wouldn’t be a problem under the circumstances (unless they appoint someone so off the wall even the Dems don’t like the person).

Of course, Pelosi is such a vicious witch that if the possibility opens up, I think even the odious Kamala should be careful walking down a flight of stairs in front of her…


31 posted on 08/26/2021 6:35:14 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: livius

The nomination requires a majority vote in both the Hose and Senate, as per the 25th amendment.

If nazi pelosi has designs on the Oval Office as a way to cap her “glorious career” (let’s face it, she’s not getting any more popular with her own constituency in the House, may be a good time to bail), then kameltoe’s VP nomination isn’t happening.


37 posted on 08/26/2021 7:01:08 AM PDT by sitetest (Professional patient. No longer mostly dead. Again. It's getting to be a habit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: livius

I’m not so sure approval of a VP would be that easy. The Senate would be 50-50 with no tiebreaker, and that makes a huge difference in terms of passing legislation. I could see the GOP saying no, they won’t give the Dems that tiebreaking vote by confirming a VP. We’ve gone without VP’s before, for multiple years. Didn’t seem to be an issue.


44 posted on 08/26/2021 10:24:44 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson