Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

PS: The FDA approval appears to be a head fake, according to Dr. Robert Malone, who invented the mRNA technology later used for the Covid 'vaccines' which he is against.

He's saying they are playing fast and loose to confuse the public into believing the FDA has approved the vax, and to falsely signal the employers to go after mandates. It's a scam, like everything else about the Wuhu Flu.

Pfizer Seeking Full Indemnification - Rumble [5 minute video: MALONE EXPOSES FDA JUST LIED AND TRICKED PUBLIC WITH 2 SUBMISSIONS]
rumble.com ^ | 8/24/2021 | Bannon's War Room, Dr. Robert Malone

Posted on 8/24/2021, 5:17:10 PM by ransomnote

[H/T Grey_whiskers]

ransomnote: looks like smoke and mirrors. Worth listening to before dealing with employers who want to use recent paper pushing to try to claim 'vaccine' is no longer under EUA.

MALONE EXPOSES FDA JUST LIED AND TRICKED PUBLIC WITH 2 SUBMISSIONS

Synopsis: There are two letters in one. No full authorization until 2023 or 2024, the way Dr. Malone reads them. The one that has the liability shield is the current one, it's still under EUA. The one that's approved, is still being developed, it doesn't exist yet, and has not liability shield. They acknowledge the cardiomyopathy issues require a 5-year follow-up.

Pfizer Seeking Full Indemnification - Rumble

24 posted on 08/25/2021 1:11:40 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Mark


32 posted on 08/25/2021 1:26:45 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Correct.


65 posted on 08/25/2021 3:52:27 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
The FDA is requiring them to conduct at least 6 studies on the "serious" concerns on the safety of the injection...yet, in the "approval" they state:

""We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion""

They contradicted themselves. Not only were "concerns" raised...the FDA themselves state that the multi-year studies are required because of: "known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis"

More here: FDA "Approval" of Pfizer Injection COMIRNATY States There Were No Concerns Or Controversial Issues - Yet - Pfizer Is Required To Conduct Several Long Term Studies (08.23.2021)

120 posted on 08/25/2021 6:18:07 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson