I was quoting indirectly from a couple of sources; among them McCullough (IIRC) and Luc Montaigner.
In the meantime, it appears that there is not as much of a consensus (which is political, and not science, by definition) as some of the pro-jab trolls would loudly shout.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/blog/with-an-rna-virus-the-past-doesn-t-predict-the-future
And don't try the tired old "gotcha" with the standard disclaimer at the top.
...given the way a couple of the MD sources were talking, it sounded like it was common knowledge in the virology community: the number of "deBOOOOOOONKers" frantically throwing every personal attack and supposed discrediting of every assertion, sentence by sentence, makes me think that Pfizer & Stooges & BoughtCongressmen & Co., *really* don't want any thought of variants or ADE to be noised about in the general population.
The link you posted is an opinion piece, but t doesn’t back up the “don’t vaccinate in a pandemic “ opinion.
Rather it argues against spreading out vaccinations so more people have one shot and are partly vaccinated vs fewer people getting two shots to be fully vaccinated. The author supports the “fewer people fully vaccinated” path. Nowhere does he argue against vaccination in a pandemic.
Again, I will accept information from a virology textbook, a statement from a recognized virology body, or a study.