Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoLibZone
So let’s see if the Freeper vaccine advocates show up on this thread, as they have on other threads, to issue snarky condemnations toward those who remain, rightfully, skeptical. I’d like to see those folks try to dismissively sweep this study aside. This sounds solid, and should result in the immediate cessation of the forced “vaccination” program.

It couldn’t be any clearer that there are serious problems, at best, with these injections, and possibly a nefarious hidden agenda, at worst, behind them.

16 posted on 08/22/2021 9:01:13 PM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: noiseman; All

> I’d like to see those folks try to dismissively sweep this study aside. This sounds solid, and should result in the immediate cessation of the forced “vaccination” program.

The study seems legit but this article completely misrepresents the results of the study. Here is a description of the study from the Francis Crick institute:

https://www.crick.ac.uk/news/2021-06-03_pfizer-biontech-vaccine-recipients-have-lower-antibody-levels-targeting-the-delta-variant-first-discovered-in-india

There is no mention whatsoever about the destruction of T cells or other such nonsense. The main point of the study is that vaccinated people have about 5 times less neutralizing antibodies against the delta variant compared to the original variant. That’s it. Here’s a key quote:

“They found that in people who had been fully vaccinated with two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, levels of neutralising antibodies were more than five times lower* against the B.1.617.2 variant when compared to the original strain, upon which current vaccines are based.

“Importantly, this antibody response was even lower in people who had only received one dose. After a single dose of Pfizer-BioNTech, 79% of people had a quantifiable neutralising antibody response against the original strain, but this fell to 50% for B.1.1.7, 32% for B.1.617.2 and 25% for B.1.351.”

Alternative news media are quoting, David Bauer, the lead scientist of this studyout of context in order to mislead people into believing that vaccinated people have 5 times less neutralizing antibodies versus unvaccinated people. That is just a flat out lie. There was no comparison with unvaccinated people. That was not the point of the study. The comparison was between 1) the amount of neutralizing antibodies against the original strain in vaccinated people versus, 2) the amount of neutralizing antibodies against the delta variant.


30 posted on 08/22/2021 9:42:32 PM PDT by Qilin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: noiseman

Simple logic- if the state is trying to force everyone to take, it cannot be good for you in any way shape or form.


37 posted on 08/22/2021 9:47:37 PM PDT by SPDSHDW (You get what you let occur with no resistance. Everything Joepedo n' felons do is on your head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: noiseman

Why bother? Even the headline doesn’t match with the article.

Meanwhile, we have screwballs in this very thread equating lack of COVID-specific T-Cells with no T-Cells and a destroyed immune system.


54 posted on 08/22/2021 10:15:13 PM PDT by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdz oncm,.dadfjl,dz )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson