[Fury]

Hey, take a look at this:

https://mobile.twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1425220557067329536

Read down to 34/ and you’ll see that one of Lindell’s staff at the Symposium is saying that they got the data from.... Dennis Montgomery

and people at the Symposium will not be able to verify the data.

Hmmm...

[tennmountainman]

What a Con by Lindell.

[Reily]

It seems Montgomery’s pulled off another big con !
I was afraid of that.
And they can’t verify the data ! - vintage Montgomery !

I’ve seen his MO before !

[FourtySeven]

Correct. See here: https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3983740/posts?page=545#545

Can the cloiser-F GET any more CF-ish???

*sigh*.........the conspiracy theory on top of conspiracy theory is starting already I fear.

Anyway, I’m done for tonight. Done with this insanity, really.

I mean I’m not a computer expert by any stretch, but even I can see this is going nowhere (even *I* know HEXadecimal means NOTHING by itself, it only LOOKS impressive to those who know nothing of computing at all).....

*sigh*....and I really do like Mike Lindell.......

[MMaschin]

That's idiotic, data can always be verified by external sources.

If the numbers Lindell has matches physical audits, you think it's coincidence?

It's no different than Hunter's laptop, the emails were real because no hoaxer would be able to fake emails that knew what the secret service was doing. The same is true here. Lindell's numbers match audits, they are REAL!

[romanesq]

“Lindell’s staff at the Symposium is saying that they got the data from.... Dennis Montgomery”

Even if you believed Montgomery’s story in full from before, how would this even remotely be possible?

He can’t blow any whistle on what he has no involvement.