Top Kek.
Look at the width of the 95% confidence interval: a factor of 18 between the top & bottom.
That's even worse than the factor of 10 error bar on the supposed background rate of youngsters getting myocarditis or whatever.
Sounds like you're feeling the heat, troll-boi.
I am not feeling the heat — I am posting a Cochrane analysis which is generally the gold standard. Please also note that I accept and published that further analysis may move the needle — but these are the data as of today.