Posted on 08/01/2021 7:27:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may grant full approval for Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccination as early as September or October, according to the Wall Street Journal, citing FDA advisers and former officials familiar with the process.
The rush for full approval - as opposed to the current emergency use authorization - comes as many schools, hospitals and employers have used full approval as a benchmark for moving forward with mandatory vaccinations.
"We’d like to see it approved as fast as humanly possible, so we can really go back to just the more normal experience," said Jim Malatras, chancellor of the State University of New York system, who currently cannot impose a vaccine mandate for some 400,000 students served under the system. At present, the school requires either vaccines or weekly testing.
Three vaccines—from Pfizer Inc. and partner BioNTech SE, Moderna Inc., and Johnson & Johnson —are authorized for emergency use in the U.S. Pfizer and Moderna have filed initial paperwork for full approval. However, only Pfizer has submitted all the necessary information to the FDA, according to the companies, and analysts expect it will be the first to get the green light. Moderna says it is still completing rolling data submissions, and Johnson & Johnson says it plans to file for full approval later this year. -Wall Street Journal
The FDA is taking an "all-hands-on-deck" approach to review Pfizer's applicaiton for full approval "as rapidly as possible in keeping with the high-quality complete assessment that the public expects from the FDA."
As the Journal notes, full approval will ease restrictions on distribution and advertising, and will allow more states, schools and employers to force people to take the jab, according to attorneys and current/former FDA officials. Once full approval is granted, the vaccine would be eligible for prescriptions as booster doses by physicians.
According to a June Kaiser Family Foundation survey, over 30% of unvaccinated Americans would be more likely to get it if the FDA grants full approval.
"The vast difference in vaccination rates across the country tell a story about what the perceptions are about risk across the country," said Harvard University associate professor Joseph Allen, head of the university's Healthy Buildings program. "If you’re a company operating in all 50 states and even internationally, it’s hard for them to move on the vaccine mandate and having a full FDA approval and authorization would make that easier."
Pfizer says it initiated a rolling submission process in May, while Moderna did the same in June - allowing them to submit finished sections of their applications without having to wait for full completion.
"It’s like if you said not all the Christmas presents are under the tree, but you can start unwrapping them," said former FDA chief scientist, Dr. Jesse Goodman.
Once a company completes its submission, the FDA has 60 days to decide whether to grant a priority review. Then, under the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the FDA must take action on an application within six months of its submission, compared with 10 months under standard review.
The agency earlier this month granted Pfizer priority review, and Moderna has said it would request one. AstraZeneca PLC said it would apply for full approval of its vaccine, which isn’t yet authorized for emergency use in the U.S., by the end of 2021. The U.S. has an oversupply of other vaccines, but the company says its vaccine can still play a role.
That said, some public health experts suggest that full approval might not do much to boost vaccination numbers due to the appearance of a rushed and politicized process.
"This sounds like an easy fix, but I think we need to understand it isn’t," said University of Michigan epidemiology professor, Arnold Monto. "If they moved more rapidly in a complicated situation, I am afraid some people would say, ‘Why did they do it so fast? Did they really scrutinize all of the data they were supposed to?’"
And this is when Pfizer loses their liability shield and agrees to compensate all injured parties, right? Right…?
Clinical trials won’t be done until next year, how does it get approved before they are finished?
Whoopie. I still don’t want it.
For a vaccine that has waning efficacy and is barely 40% effective against the Delta variant?
Vaccines were removed from the jurisdiction of US civil courts in 1986.
Some people like to act like something changed with COVID-19. But it didn’t. Same rules that have been in place for decades. Full approval moves the jurisdiction of injury complaints from CICP to VICP. And VICP is basically a free lottery where you don’t even have to prove that the vaccine caused your injury. You just have to come up with a story that makes it sound like it could have and you get six-figures.
Seven years goes by fast ... when you’re being gaslighted!
The trial is a bust...too much liability.
That African country that got the placebo?
They were the control group.
Clinical trials always continue to monitor participants for new results, but the Phase 3 clinical trial data was available for Pfizer and Moderna back in December 2020. They have all the safety and efficacy data required to perform the review.
The rules haven’t changed with COVID. Same rules it’s always been. Same rules for an EUA. Same rules for Priority Review. Same rules for full FDA approval (BLA). Anyone who says things are different with the COVID-19 vaccines is either unfamiliar with the processes or is being intentionally dishonest.
I wonder if approval requires a forensic unit of all VAER data. If not, I would be skeptical of the final decision being based on anything except political science.
No
The law passed in 1986 shields them from any damages.
It will get approved because it’s all about POLITICS and $$$$. Period. Public health & individual health have nothing to do with it. The pressure to approve so those tyrannically mandating the jabs will have a leg to stand on will prevail.
Rubber stamp that sucker.
They’re pushing it there’s not necessarily any proof to this story.
A certain poster in this thread is intimating that the vetting processes of the covid vaccines are the same as for all vaccines. This link to John’s Hopkins suggests that this poster is being disingenuous.
https://www.coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/timeline
Because shut up.
Not sure that’s entirely true. But you could be right. All I know is, as nurse, when the epidemiologists you work with say in a staff meeting, after getting vaccinated, ’we ARE the experiment’, something is up
+1
+1
Yeah. The FDA. Run by DRUG companies! What could go wrong? And is there some magical way to trial vaccines, that doesn’t take YEARS, now? Sure. I’d trust that./s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.