Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long

that’s an interesting question. I dunno. However, I would think that if the Jabbed are infected, it is with a real virus that they encountered. Therefore, I would theorize that the immunity from surviving would be effective and durable.

Additionally, recall that approximately 80% of people already had some measure of immunity, and if such a person caught a virus no matter who from, it would tune up the natural immunity.

In addition to all the other risks associated with the injection, this ability of the shot to dampen the symptoms, makes the spread more likely-a negative for public health.

And from an individual standpoint that jabbed person is getting delayed treatment because they don’t know they are infected—and we know early treatment is important to their health, as well as to reduce the need for hospitalization.


74 posted on 07/29/2021 9:24:13 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes; Jane Long

So it sounds like the vaxxes are causing a worse epidemic that simply letting the virus run its course.

People are sicker when they do show symptoms and spread it more making the vaxxed super spreaders.


77 posted on 07/29/2021 10:27:35 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson