Posted on 07/27/2021 9:56:23 PM PDT by cba123
No Chinese company involved in the CCP’s genocide, human rights abuses and use of forced labor should be able to access our markets and raise money from American investors
--
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. say they want to send what's being called a big China bill to President Joe Biden. That's Washington-speak for major legislation that will push back on China's economic power. But to back up their words with action, the two Democratic leaders are going to have to take on one of Washington’s most powerful special interest groups and financiers of the Democratic Party: Wall Street.
For decades, Wall Street has profited by helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) fund its companies via U.S. capital markets, exploiting tens of millions of unwitting American investors in the process. Thankfully, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle want to address this, including prominent legislators like Senators Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Tom Cotton, R-Ark. and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.
But so far, Pelosi and Schumer have been unwilling to put Wall Street in the crosshairs and end the current status quo, in which well-known financial companies sell out America.
(Please see link for full article)
(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...
Screw Wall Street.
(Sorry but that is true)
Bring back American jobs now.
What a wonderful sense of humor. Pelosi and Schumer, crack down on their friends on Wall Street, to make them crack down on their friends in communist China.... LOL
“Pelosi and Schumer must stop Wall Street from funding the Chinese Communist Party and its campaign of evil”
Good luck with that.
Senators Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Tom Cotton, R-Ark. and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.
And President Donald Trump. :)
They’d be defunding themselves. Fat chance.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for that.
I don’t know about Schumer, but I consider Nancy Pelosi to be a fully developed A-Moral personality, meaning she has no closely held views as to what is ‘proper and appropriate’.
Nancy’s only concern is how anything benefits, enlarges or maintains her scope of power and influence. That is the only thing she care’s about.
We still don’t know all she knew about Barrack Obama, and chose to ‘forget’ because it would benefit her position.
There is still no one close to that group of influencers who has the courage or even the concern to tell the whole story.
Pelosi and Schumer are evil. Why would they act of character?
Well, Joe, Chuck & Nancy, do you want Amazon to have non-book merchandise or not?
Xi
I almost guffawed at the thought of either Pelousy or Schmuckie possessing a single moral fiber, even a hairlike one. Nope. Nothing there. If it benefits them, they keep it in place. Couldn’t care less if it destroys the country and its people around them. Their place in Hell is already quite assured.
All BS! Should read: NO CHINESE COMPANY should have access to American markets, capital, property or other American companies...
Politics has a way of attracting the very worst of the worst to the pinnacles of power. That is why the Constitution was set up to give as little power to them as possible. It took 2 centuries for the scum of the Earth to bring America to where it is today. It’s also why it included Article V.
Which of these is not like the others?
“America needs to bring back our factories.
Screw Wall Street.
(Sorry but that is true)
Bring back American jobs now.”
It’ll happen incrementally, with or without Wall Street participation.
We as a nation have screwed up.
Great Power Nations take care of ALL their people, they don’t cede whole industries to foreign nations because historically that is foolish.
There are three sectors that every Great Power better take care of, or you won’t remain great power.
Agriculture, Finance, & Industry.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA The swamp creatures have grown filthy rich from insider trading and hitching their ride to the CCP.
Honesty here....how are these two idiots going to stop Wall Street from funding the CCP when the two idiots are themselves in bed with the CCP? The article is stupid and lacks rationale.
I don’t think Article V is the panacea. It would put the Second Amendment on the table, no?
Your idea of rolling election laws back to 1970 is better
Who knows? The left is pretty scared though. That is a good sign. Since 3/4's of the States have to approve any amendments passed I'm more worried of good stuff not getting approved. If there is anything I've learned about State Legislatures it is they are timid and rather quitely get reelected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.